Technology

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[–] walrusintraining@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I’ve coded LLMs, I was just simplifying it because at its base level it’s not that different. It’s just much more convoluted as I said. They’re essentially selling someone else’s work as their own, it’s just run through a computer program first.

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[–] PupBiru@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

it’s nothing like that at all… if someone bought a book and produced a big table of words and the likelihood that the next word would be followed by another word, that’s what we’re talking about: it’s abstract statistics

actually, that’s not even what we’re talking about… we then take that word table and then combine it with hundreds of thousands of other tables until the original is so far from the original as to be completely untraceable back to the original work

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[–] walrusintraining@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

If it were trained on a single book, the output would be the book. That’s the base level without all the convolution and that’s what we should be looking at. Do you also think someone should be able to train a model on your appearance and use it to sell images and videos, even though it’s technically not your likeness?