So I've realized that in conversations I'll use traditional terms for men as general terms for all genders, both singularly and for groups. I always mean it well, but I've been thinking that it's not as inclusive to women/trans people.

For example I would say:

"What's up guys?" "How's it going man?" "Good job, my dude!” etc.

Replacing these terms with person, people, etc sounds awkward. Y'all works but sounds very southern US (nowhere near where I am located) so it sounds out of place.

So what are some better options?

Edit: thanks for all the answers peoples, I appreciate the honest ones and some of the funny ones.

The simplest approach is to just drop the usage of guys, man, etc. Folks for groups and mate for singular appeal to me when I do want to add one in between friends.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 123 points 2 years ago (5 children)

A lot of people use “folks” for plural.

I feel like “guys” is fairly un-gendered but people disagree with me. Personally, I haven’t used the word “guys” to refer to anything male in what seems like forever.

“Bud” and “fella” are good singulars.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I really, really wish we could degender "guy" and "guys". I know plenty of people of all genders that use the words in general to describe people, objects, concepts, everything. The only holdouts are people that insist on it specifically meaning males. Ironically, these people are often the hardcore feminists.

    If other English words can change their meanings and be claimed/reclaimed by certain groups, why can't others?

    Take guy! Use it to describe whatever you want! Free it of its historically phallic shackles!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Yeah, I agree with you gal, while we're at it I wish we could degender "gal", "chick", and "doll" too. Equality for all!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    This sounds not to dissimilar to those who argued that legalizing gay marriage would lead to people marrying horses or their cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    How's that? I'm not arguing against anything, I said I want more words to be disgendered

    How come people seem to only want words that were originally masculine coded words to be disgendered, but don't want that for words that are originally feminine coded?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Guy was originally gender neutral as it was used to call someone stupidly bold (iirc). The term was most often used toward a single gender that was known for being stupidly bold and became synonymous with that gender. That's how it became gendered.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

    "Guys" is ungendered.

    Reconsider whether it's worth being friends with people that insist on fighting over the term "guys".

    And if you are surrounded by a lot of particularly sensitive people, just call them "friend" or "friends". It works for people you both like and dislike. Glorious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Sure, but as a professional (teacher) I’m not willing to put my career on the line by challenging a sensitive parent. A few years ago we were told not to use that word, and when it comes to things like that, I do as I’m told.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    If you are in the Midwest, Guys is absolutely gender neutral.

    Edit: downvote me all you want guys, it won’t change the truth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments