114
Why have YouTubers ceased reuploading videos to alternative platforms around December 2023? (lemy.lol)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I prefer not to support Google, so I’ve been using alternative platforms. However, I’ve noticed that the YouTubers I follow have stopped reuploading their videos to these platforms. Has anyone else observed this? What could be the reason behind this change?

Relevant links: Brodie Robertson eBuzz Central Foundation for Econ. Education Upper Echelon Gamers

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 88 points 2 years ago (3 children)

No platform pays nearly as well as YouTube does on average. If they upload to other platforms, and you watch the content on those other platforms, they’re going to make significantly less money than if you watch on YouTube. Even if there’s increased reach from uploading to multiple platforms, the creator will almost certainly make less—so there’s less than no incentive for them to upload elsewhere.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 59 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I believe Nebula pays fantastically well, at least according to Sam from Wendover Productions. This is attributed to the fact that Nebula charges a subscription and half the subscription fees are divvied up to the channels according to watch time.

    However, he owns a significant portion of Nebula so he's not a disinterested information source.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    My annual subscription to Nebula expired last month. I didn't renew. They seemed to have a mix of exactly what you get on YouTube and some peculiar TV documentaries that weren't quite good enough to make brand name TV channels

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    I don't think that from a purely "rational consumer" perspective Nebula is worth the $30 per year demanded. But to me, it's like a Patreon subscription. I can support my favourite creators and I get some nice perks in return, like offline video downloads and advertising and sponsor-free programming. These perks are not worth $30 a year to me. But I will continue to support them anyway.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm broke, so if they exclusively upload to nebula, they aren't getting anything from my view because it doesn't happen.

    Uploading to both though seems like a good idea

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    There are original series on Nebula that cost a lot to make so I understand that they need to recoup the investment on those.

    But most videos are released on both platforms. The Nebula versions usually have extended cuts and are free of adverts and sponsors, but the programming is otherwise the same.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Also, YouTube is a removed to run, hardware wise, they must have farms upon farms of servers everywhere, on top of CND infrastructure. Do not envy their bandwidth bill. Few out there can or could compete, even if they wanted to.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent