you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I was told by my first economics professor that if I could solve that problem, and eliminate the assumption of rationality, I'd be the richest man on earth over night.

It's a problem, they know it's a problem, they just don't have a better answer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    You can't even assume everyone can agree on the same definition of rational. If a business owner is a sadist they might value treating their employees like dirt more than the money they'd make if the business ran more efficiently. For a dickhead, rational self interest could mean forgoing profit to cause misery.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    Rational in the economics sense just means that people do things for a reason. We're not acting randomly, we believe that when we put money towards a thing that we are receiving something of value for it.

    Any more specific than that and we're not talking about rationality in the economics sense any more. Rationality does not mean correct. Just with cause.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    ...they might value treating their employees like dirt more than the money they'd make it the business ran more efficiently.

    This sounds like the metric for hiring middle-management if anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments