you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Yeah the article is fascinating. I'm really surprised that the company constitution didn't have anti-dilution built into it though. That's a child level error when getting into business with someone like Trump.

Still shocked they gave him 90% just for his name essentially. Also surprised at just how high it's valued.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    They also claimed they were going to become a streaming platform that would replace Netflix and Disney+ and they would have 80 million users in their first year, pretty sure most of that valuation is imaginary. Didn’t they only make it to around 5 million users?

  • source
  • parent