โฒ 44 โผ What non-technical criticisms do you have of the Lemmy/kbin/link aggregator fediverse experience? (septic.win) submitted 3 years ago by LimitedDuck@septic.win to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml 124 comments fedilink hide all child comments Exclude explicit software bugginess or missing features Include experiences or knock-on effects that may have arisen from (1) Comparisons to Reddit are ok. We know the reasons for the differences, but this is just about expressing yourself
[โ] cmat273@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 years ago (2 children) Lemmy has no algorithm. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] nave@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [โ] cmat273@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) That's not really what I was referring to. Sure it selects posts automatically but it's not like it picks what it thinks a specific user is going to click on. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] nave@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [โ] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) but it is just a simple vote count/time decay, no consideration given to what you have interacted with in the past, ie the "algorithm" on other platforms permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] dan@upvote.au 3 points 3 years ago That's why the content isn't sorted as well as it could be. There's no one-size-fits-all for social media as people have different things they like. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] CoderKat@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago* Yes there is, and it's not that different from reddit. The sorting algorithm is what they refer to. Eg, hot is some balance of time vs votes, which greatly favours newer posts (too new, IMO -- posts it shows will typically no comments or maybe just one or two). Active favours high commenting rates and based on my observations, it seems to drop off around 2 days (too old, IMO -- a considerable number of posts shown by this algorithm seem to be around the 2 day mark). The top and new algorithms are straightforward enough. All the algorithms favour big communities. There's a "best" algorithm in development, which would try to look at the top for each community and thus give smaller communities a chance. I can't wait for that, because right now, you'll rarely if ever see a small community hit the front page and it sucks bad. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] nave@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [โ] cmat273@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) That's not really what I was referring to. Sure it selects posts automatically but it's not like it picks what it thinks a specific user is going to click on. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] nave@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [โ] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) but it is just a simple vote count/time decay, no consideration given to what you have interacted with in the past, ie the "algorithm" on other platforms permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] dan@upvote.au 3 points 3 years ago That's why the content isn't sorted as well as it could be. There's no one-size-fits-all for social media as people have different things they like. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] cmat273@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) That's not really what I was referring to. Sure it selects posts automatically but it's not like it picks what it thinks a specific user is going to click on. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] nave@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] nave@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) but it is just a simple vote count/time decay, no consideration given to what you have interacted with in the past, ie the "algorithm" on other platforms permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] dan@upvote.au 3 points 3 years ago That's why the content isn't sorted as well as it could be. There's no one-size-fits-all for social media as people have different things they like. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] dan@upvote.au 3 points 3 years ago That's why the content isn't sorted as well as it could be. There's no one-size-fits-all for social media as people have different things they like. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] CoderKat@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago* Yes there is, and it's not that different from reddit. The sorting algorithm is what they refer to. Eg, hot is some balance of time vs votes, which greatly favours newer posts (too new, IMO -- posts it shows will typically no comments or maybe just one or two). Active favours high commenting rates and based on my observations, it seems to drop off around 2 days (too old, IMO -- a considerable number of posts shown by this algorithm seem to be around the 2 day mark). The top and new algorithms are straightforward enough. All the algorithms favour big communities. There's a "best" algorithm in development, which would try to look at the top for each community and thus give smaller communities a chance. I can't wait for that, because right now, you'll rarely if ever see a small community hit the front page and it sucks bad. permalink fedilink source parent