▲ 1710 ▼ No one is forcing you to work (i.imgur.com) submitted 3 years ago by BarterClub@sh.itjust.works to c/antiwork@lemmy.world 274 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] aidan@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago (2 children) Life is not naturally easy- it is only because of the labor of others that life is anywhere near as comfortable as it is now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) We have the means to make a fair and equitable society with minimal crime and no hunger. We, as a society, choose not to. We choose the hard life for the sake of getting everything we worked for to ourselves at the risk of losing it all with one bad day. That's not comfortable. The labour of all should benefit all so that everyone can have an easy and comfortable life. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] placq@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) What do you mean by "we chaosem the hard life"? What do you think should be done to achive easy life for everyone? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) We choose to continue to live in a pro-capitalist society, therefore we choose the hard life. Pure and true socialism is the easy way out my friend. Comfort for all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] placq@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) But how? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago More taxes ( mostly corporate) and not have the government misappropriate the funds, and giving a shit about other humans is a great start. permalink fedilink source parent [–] orrk@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) life can be easy for everyone if we all chip in a little, it's the whole basis of society, we just can't afford the hoarding aristocracy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Serious question: do you think the "aristocracy" has like, vaults full of money? Like you think Jeff Bezos has billions of dollars sitting in his bank account? Or a literal vault? Because that is definitely not how rich people actually live. As a rule, they have very little liquidity as a percent of their net worth. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) What does that have to do with anything? Just because the wealth is on paper doesn't make it any less real. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) It matters because people suggest that Bezos et al "hoard wealth" which is both untrue and impossible with the way their wealth is calculated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) But they are totally hoarding their on paper wealth. It's impossible to end up with $200 billion without intentionally hoarding it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That's not true at all. Bezos, for instance, is worth so much solely because Amazon is worth so much. It has nothing to do with his personal spending habits whatsoever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Bezos is the CEO of Amazon, he can definitely take some of the credit/blame that it's worth so much and that he has such a large stake. He could cash out at any point, but he chooses not to, aka hoarding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) ... what exactly do you think would happen to Amazon's stock value if Bezos cashed out? And how exactly is owning a company "hoarding" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) It would drop a bit, depending on how he handled the PR. Anyway, then he could donate 99.99% of his wealth and still have far more than any of us will ever have in our lives. But he doesn't, because he's hoarding it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago Dude there's nothing else to say but you literally do not know how wealth actually works permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) We have the means to make a fair and equitable society with minimal crime and no hunger. We, as a society, choose not to. We choose the hard life for the sake of getting everything we worked for to ourselves at the risk of losing it all with one bad day. That's not comfortable. The labour of all should benefit all so that everyone can have an easy and comfortable life. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] placq@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) What do you mean by "we chaosem the hard life"? What do you think should be done to achive easy life for everyone? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) We choose to continue to live in a pro-capitalist society, therefore we choose the hard life. Pure and true socialism is the easy way out my friend. Comfort for all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] placq@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) But how? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago More taxes ( mostly corporate) and not have the government misappropriate the funds, and giving a shit about other humans is a great start. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] placq@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) What do you mean by "we chaosem the hard life"? What do you think should be done to achive easy life for everyone? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) We choose to continue to live in a pro-capitalist society, therefore we choose the hard life. Pure and true socialism is the easy way out my friend. Comfort for all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] placq@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) But how? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago More taxes ( mostly corporate) and not have the government misappropriate the funds, and giving a shit about other humans is a great start. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) We choose to continue to live in a pro-capitalist society, therefore we choose the hard life. Pure and true socialism is the easy way out my friend. Comfort for all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] placq@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) But how? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago More taxes ( mostly corporate) and not have the government misappropriate the funds, and giving a shit about other humans is a great start. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] placq@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) But how? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago More taxes ( mostly corporate) and not have the government misappropriate the funds, and giving a shit about other humans is a great start. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago More taxes ( mostly corporate) and not have the government misappropriate the funds, and giving a shit about other humans is a great start. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] orrk@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) life can be easy for everyone if we all chip in a little, it's the whole basis of society, we just can't afford the hoarding aristocracy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Serious question: do you think the "aristocracy" has like, vaults full of money? Like you think Jeff Bezos has billions of dollars sitting in his bank account? Or a literal vault? Because that is definitely not how rich people actually live. As a rule, they have very little liquidity as a percent of their net worth. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) What does that have to do with anything? Just because the wealth is on paper doesn't make it any less real. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) It matters because people suggest that Bezos et al "hoard wealth" which is both untrue and impossible with the way their wealth is calculated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) But they are totally hoarding their on paper wealth. It's impossible to end up with $200 billion without intentionally hoarding it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That's not true at all. Bezos, for instance, is worth so much solely because Amazon is worth so much. It has nothing to do with his personal spending habits whatsoever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Bezos is the CEO of Amazon, he can definitely take some of the credit/blame that it's worth so much and that he has such a large stake. He could cash out at any point, but he chooses not to, aka hoarding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) ... what exactly do you think would happen to Amazon's stock value if Bezos cashed out? And how exactly is owning a company "hoarding" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) It would drop a bit, depending on how he handled the PR. Anyway, then he could donate 99.99% of his wealth and still have far more than any of us will ever have in our lives. But he doesn't, because he's hoarding it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago Dude there's nothing else to say but you literally do not know how wealth actually works permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SCB@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Serious question: do you think the "aristocracy" has like, vaults full of money? Like you think Jeff Bezos has billions of dollars sitting in his bank account? Or a literal vault? Because that is definitely not how rich people actually live. As a rule, they have very little liquidity as a percent of their net worth. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) What does that have to do with anything? Just because the wealth is on paper doesn't make it any less real. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) It matters because people suggest that Bezos et al "hoard wealth" which is both untrue and impossible with the way their wealth is calculated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) But they are totally hoarding their on paper wealth. It's impossible to end up with $200 billion without intentionally hoarding it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That's not true at all. Bezos, for instance, is worth so much solely because Amazon is worth so much. It has nothing to do with his personal spending habits whatsoever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Bezos is the CEO of Amazon, he can definitely take some of the credit/blame that it's worth so much and that he has such a large stake. He could cash out at any point, but he chooses not to, aka hoarding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) ... what exactly do you think would happen to Amazon's stock value if Bezos cashed out? And how exactly is owning a company "hoarding" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) It would drop a bit, depending on how he handled the PR. Anyway, then he could donate 99.99% of his wealth and still have far more than any of us will ever have in our lives. But he doesn't, because he's hoarding it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago Dude there's nothing else to say but you literally do not know how wealth actually works permalink fedilink source parent
[–] biddy@feddit.nl 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) What does that have to do with anything? Just because the wealth is on paper doesn't make it any less real. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) It matters because people suggest that Bezos et al "hoard wealth" which is both untrue and impossible with the way their wealth is calculated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) But they are totally hoarding their on paper wealth. It's impossible to end up with $200 billion without intentionally hoarding it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That's not true at all. Bezos, for instance, is worth so much solely because Amazon is worth so much. It has nothing to do with his personal spending habits whatsoever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Bezos is the CEO of Amazon, he can definitely take some of the credit/blame that it's worth so much and that he has such a large stake. He could cash out at any point, but he chooses not to, aka hoarding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) ... what exactly do you think would happen to Amazon's stock value if Bezos cashed out? And how exactly is owning a company "hoarding" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) It would drop a bit, depending on how he handled the PR. Anyway, then he could donate 99.99% of his wealth and still have far more than any of us will ever have in our lives. But he doesn't, because he's hoarding it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago Dude there's nothing else to say but you literally do not know how wealth actually works permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) It matters because people suggest that Bezos et al "hoard wealth" which is both untrue and impossible with the way their wealth is calculated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) But they are totally hoarding their on paper wealth. It's impossible to end up with $200 billion without intentionally hoarding it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That's not true at all. Bezos, for instance, is worth so much solely because Amazon is worth so much. It has nothing to do with his personal spending habits whatsoever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Bezos is the CEO of Amazon, he can definitely take some of the credit/blame that it's worth so much and that he has such a large stake. He could cash out at any point, but he chooses not to, aka hoarding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) ... what exactly do you think would happen to Amazon's stock value if Bezos cashed out? And how exactly is owning a company "hoarding" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) It would drop a bit, depending on how he handled the PR. Anyway, then he could donate 99.99% of his wealth and still have far more than any of us will ever have in our lives. But he doesn't, because he's hoarding it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago Dude there's nothing else to say but you literally do not know how wealth actually works permalink fedilink source parent
[–] biddy@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) But they are totally hoarding their on paper wealth. It's impossible to end up with $200 billion without intentionally hoarding it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That's not true at all. Bezos, for instance, is worth so much solely because Amazon is worth so much. It has nothing to do with his personal spending habits whatsoever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Bezos is the CEO of Amazon, he can definitely take some of the credit/blame that it's worth so much and that he has such a large stake. He could cash out at any point, but he chooses not to, aka hoarding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) ... what exactly do you think would happen to Amazon's stock value if Bezos cashed out? And how exactly is owning a company "hoarding" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) It would drop a bit, depending on how he handled the PR. Anyway, then he could donate 99.99% of his wealth and still have far more than any of us will ever have in our lives. But he doesn't, because he's hoarding it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago Dude there's nothing else to say but you literally do not know how wealth actually works permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That's not true at all. Bezos, for instance, is worth so much solely because Amazon is worth so much. It has nothing to do with his personal spending habits whatsoever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Bezos is the CEO of Amazon, he can definitely take some of the credit/blame that it's worth so much and that he has such a large stake. He could cash out at any point, but he chooses not to, aka hoarding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) ... what exactly do you think would happen to Amazon's stock value if Bezos cashed out? And how exactly is owning a company "hoarding" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) It would drop a bit, depending on how he handled the PR. Anyway, then he could donate 99.99% of his wealth and still have far more than any of us will ever have in our lives. But he doesn't, because he's hoarding it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago Dude there's nothing else to say but you literally do not know how wealth actually works permalink fedilink source parent
[–] biddy@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Bezos is the CEO of Amazon, he can definitely take some of the credit/blame that it's worth so much and that he has such a large stake. He could cash out at any point, but he chooses not to, aka hoarding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) ... what exactly do you think would happen to Amazon's stock value if Bezos cashed out? And how exactly is owning a company "hoarding" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) It would drop a bit, depending on how he handled the PR. Anyway, then he could donate 99.99% of his wealth and still have far more than any of us will ever have in our lives. But he doesn't, because he's hoarding it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago Dude there's nothing else to say but you literally do not know how wealth actually works permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) ... what exactly do you think would happen to Amazon's stock value if Bezos cashed out? And how exactly is owning a company "hoarding" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] biddy@feddit.nl 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) It would drop a bit, depending on how he handled the PR. Anyway, then he could donate 99.99% of his wealth and still have far more than any of us will ever have in our lives. But he doesn't, because he's hoarding it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago Dude there's nothing else to say but you literally do not know how wealth actually works permalink fedilink source parent
[–] biddy@feddit.nl 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) It would drop a bit, depending on how he handled the PR. Anyway, then he could donate 99.99% of his wealth and still have far more than any of us will ever have in our lives. But he doesn't, because he's hoarding it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago Dude there's nothing else to say but you literally do not know how wealth actually works permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago Dude there's nothing else to say but you literally do not know how wealth actually works permalink fedilink source parent
