▲ 508 ▼ The lethal doses of 55 substances (infosec.pub) submitted 2 years ago by Ninjazzon@infosec.pub to c/coolguides@lemmy.ca 159 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] SoonaPaana@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is a very very cool graphic. Really highlights that MSG is needlessly antagonized. Also so weird to see sarin and nicotine next to each other. Marketing is a bitch. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jochem@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (3 children) Let's not forget this only refers to LD50 not permanent organ damage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 years ago* Exactly. Gasoline, for example, is remarkably non-toxic, but it will cause instant chemical burns to your throat and lungs, possibly killing you far below the (chemically) lethal dose. Methanol will turn you blind at a quarter of the listed dose, and those two are just from the top of my head. permalink fedilink source parent [–] neo@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) I wonder how they came up with the LD50 of all those materials, like THC and LSD. Is this based on theoretical calculation, in vitro tests, or on a (assumably) very small sample of known deaths? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] yetAnotherUser@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Step 1: Feed/Inject mutliple rat populations with different concentrations Step 2: See how many die. Step 3: The concentration which causes 50% of the population to die is the LD50 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] neo@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago While I was thinking you were yet another user, you were a rat the whole time! Wait, we are all rats! Jokes aside, animal testing as a data source seems reasonable to me. Thanks permalink fedilink source parent [–] H4mi@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago All the above, most likely permalink fedilink source parent [–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago* Or aspects like arsenic staying in your body a very long time, or the fact that LSD is psychoactive in microgram doses, so you'd need thousands of tabs to die. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jochem@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (3 children) Let's not forget this only refers to LD50 not permanent organ damage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 years ago* Exactly. Gasoline, for example, is remarkably non-toxic, but it will cause instant chemical burns to your throat and lungs, possibly killing you far below the (chemically) lethal dose. Methanol will turn you blind at a quarter of the listed dose, and those two are just from the top of my head. permalink fedilink source parent [–] neo@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) I wonder how they came up with the LD50 of all those materials, like THC and LSD. Is this based on theoretical calculation, in vitro tests, or on a (assumably) very small sample of known deaths? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] yetAnotherUser@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Step 1: Feed/Inject mutliple rat populations with different concentrations Step 2: See how many die. Step 3: The concentration which causes 50% of the population to die is the LD50 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] neo@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago While I was thinking you were yet another user, you were a rat the whole time! Wait, we are all rats! Jokes aside, animal testing as a data source seems reasonable to me. Thanks permalink fedilink source parent [–] H4mi@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago All the above, most likely permalink fedilink source parent [–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago* Or aspects like arsenic staying in your body a very long time, or the fact that LSD is psychoactive in microgram doses, so you'd need thousands of tabs to die. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 years ago* Exactly. Gasoline, for example, is remarkably non-toxic, but it will cause instant chemical burns to your throat and lungs, possibly killing you far below the (chemically) lethal dose. Methanol will turn you blind at a quarter of the listed dose, and those two are just from the top of my head. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] neo@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) I wonder how they came up with the LD50 of all those materials, like THC and LSD. Is this based on theoretical calculation, in vitro tests, or on a (assumably) very small sample of known deaths? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] yetAnotherUser@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Step 1: Feed/Inject mutliple rat populations with different concentrations Step 2: See how many die. Step 3: The concentration which causes 50% of the population to die is the LD50 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] neo@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago While I was thinking you were yet another user, you were a rat the whole time! Wait, we are all rats! Jokes aside, animal testing as a data source seems reasonable to me. Thanks permalink fedilink source parent [–] H4mi@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago All the above, most likely permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yetAnotherUser@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Step 1: Feed/Inject mutliple rat populations with different concentrations Step 2: See how many die. Step 3: The concentration which causes 50% of the population to die is the LD50 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] neo@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago While I was thinking you were yet another user, you were a rat the whole time! Wait, we are all rats! Jokes aside, animal testing as a data source seems reasonable to me. Thanks permalink fedilink source parent
[–] neo@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago While I was thinking you were yet another user, you were a rat the whole time! Wait, we are all rats! Jokes aside, animal testing as a data source seems reasonable to me. Thanks permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago* Or aspects like arsenic staying in your body a very long time, or the fact that LSD is psychoactive in microgram doses, so you'd need thousands of tabs to die. permalink fedilink source parent