▲ 603 ▼ rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone) submitted 2 years ago by ashestoashes@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone 50 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] pennomi@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] don@lemm.ee 20 points 2 years ago (1 child) Pretty sure a cancerous growth is a mortal wound. Those get closed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) The question is does it have the effects listed in the order they're presented? Because if it does I'd argue it reintroduces the growth. If it restores body parts and then cures mortal wounds I'm with you though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] don@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago I also have to question whether a cancerous growth would be considered a body part, relative to the spell. But given the apparent restorative nature of the spell, I doubt it would (re)introduce anything inherently harmful. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Omgarm@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago Also you have to clip your toenails again. permalink fedilink source parent [–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago Hm. Maybe. But maybe the new cells wouldn't mutate in the same way this time. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] don@lemm.ee 20 points 2 years ago (1 child) Pretty sure a cancerous growth is a mortal wound. Those get closed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) The question is does it have the effects listed in the order they're presented? Because if it does I'd argue it reintroduces the growth. If it restores body parts and then cures mortal wounds I'm with you though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] don@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago I also have to question whether a cancerous growth would be considered a body part, relative to the spell. But given the apparent restorative nature of the spell, I doubt it would (re)introduce anything inherently harmful. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) The question is does it have the effects listed in the order they're presented? Because if it does I'd argue it reintroduces the growth. If it restores body parts and then cures mortal wounds I'm with you though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] don@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago I also have to question whether a cancerous growth would be considered a body part, relative to the spell. But given the apparent restorative nature of the spell, I doubt it would (re)introduce anything inherently harmful. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] don@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago I also have to question whether a cancerous growth would be considered a body part, relative to the spell. But given the apparent restorative nature of the spell, I doubt it would (re)introduce anything inherently harmful. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Omgarm@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago Also you have to clip your toenails again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago Hm. Maybe. But maybe the new cells wouldn't mutate in the same way this time. permalink fedilink source parent