you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Well there's apparently more than 400 million active users every month, so they could charge users a few cent per month and pay for the infrastructure entirely. But they choose to be massive privacy invading assholes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    If they charged users any amount of money there wouldn't even be 400000 of them anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago*

    Yes there'd be less, but the amount is purely speculative and you don't know anymore than I do.

    Even if they have to go with the ad-supported model to maintain a large active userbase, that can easily be done without all the tracking. But again, they chose the shittiest option...there's really a pattern of them just being massive assholes. No matter what options they have, they'll apparently go for the shittiest one that screws over the users the most.

  • source
  • parent