822
Study finds anti-piracy messages backfire, especially for men (phys.org)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
216 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 94 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Exactly. If there was a Spotify-like service for video where i could get 99.9% of all tv and movies of all time in one place without ads, then I'd be willing to pay like 40 bucks a month, maybe even 50. But since no video service is even remotely close to that, then i just pirate instead, which provides exactly that type of service, and costs zero dollars a month.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Shit dude, give me access to most things I want to watch and most of the stuff I've forgotten about and that's worth $50/month as a minimum.

    I've come full circle back to wearing an eye patch. I was using amazon, hulu, hbo and paramount, usually letting some lapse or pause to watch stuff on the other ones but they have all gone to shit. It's impossible to find what you might be interested because just like netflix they show the same shows/movies in multiple categories and their search sucks ass plus they are all missing a ton of good shows.

    Now I am slowly downloading shows from the past that I don't already have in my library and haven't watched in years while I keep an eye out for new shows I might be interested in. I use showrss to auto download current shows that it has in its DB to a vps and I have sync setup to mirror it to my nas so I can stream it to my TV with vlc. So much easier than opening hulu, finding the show I want to catch up on, etc.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I’ve gone through the effort to build a 50terabyte media center. And am slowly filling it with tv shows, movies, and documentaries I like. It’s expensive and inconvenient. But still a fun hobby.

    But the reason I do it is because I can have everything in one spot. Easily accessible. I control it. Never going back.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago

    This is the way. It's just me who watches stuff off my nas and I'm fine with vlc so I don't use plex or jellyfin or whatever. I have an old (at this point) qnap nas that I've been doing the same with. Mine is a total of 40tb'ish iirc. I definitely need to get a second nas and some more drives but for now what I have is enough though I am going to run out of space soonish.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    And they also shouldnt require specific browsers and a CPU that is less than 2 years old to stream content in resolutions above 720p.

    Its not because its not possible, its because it lacks some bullshit copyright protection.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    I find it interesting, how Spotify is often mentioned as the standard service because last time I used it, it struggled with similar issues as the video streaming platforms, that not every song I want to listen to is available

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    There's one thing that's preventing me from doing exactly that and that is, as a non-native English speaker with tinnitus, the constant struggle to find good subtitles that are properly synced. My lazy ass just wants to enjoy a movie at a normal volume without having to force myself to be super-focussed in order not to miss the whole goddamn plot of the movie.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent