▲ 637 ▼ Signal introduces usernames and phone number privacy. (signal.org) submitted 2 years ago by 7eter@feddit.de to c/privacy@lemmy.ml 93 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] fuzzzerd@programming.dev 17 points 2 years ago (2 children) Seems the second group is a vocal minority. This feature helps the first group, but doesn't help the second group. According to Signal, the first group is the larger group and this helps the most users of Signal. Could it be better? Sure. This is still a good step in terms of privacy, even though it doesn't really improve anonymity. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago Its important to not let perfect be the enemy of good. permalink fedilink source parent [–] preasket@lemy.lol 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Personally, I care about the phone number requirement not because I don't want to reveal it to Signal servers, but because it limits access to Signal for people in countries that block their SMS service - registration messages just don't arrive permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's specific to signal? Like they want to block people registering or what's up with that SMS block? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago Not specific to Signal. I believe he was referring to places where Twilio doesn't serve, for example because of sanctions. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago Its important to not let perfect be the enemy of good. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] preasket@lemy.lol 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Personally, I care about the phone number requirement not because I don't want to reveal it to Signal servers, but because it limits access to Signal for people in countries that block their SMS service - registration messages just don't arrive permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's specific to signal? Like they want to block people registering or what's up with that SMS block? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago Not specific to Signal. I believe he was referring to places where Twilio doesn't serve, for example because of sanctions. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's specific to signal? Like they want to block people registering or what's up with that SMS block? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago Not specific to Signal. I believe he was referring to places where Twilio doesn't serve, for example because of sanctions. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago Not specific to Signal. I believe he was referring to places where Twilio doesn't serve, for example because of sanctions. permalink fedilink source parent