you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [+] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Setting up a server just for this is clearly overkill, but if you already have a homeserver it would be great to be able to deploy the backend. Sadly there is no such thing currently

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I totally agree. Running a server on a home machine that's already running 24/7 is trivial. I don't know why this guy is acting like it's a big deal. I've got a $100 mini-PC running multiple servers already. What's one more?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Not necessarily. Most people in the US are locked into some kind of ridiculous contract that makes swapping/upgrading their phone a pain in the ass and a financial burden. To be fair, these same types of people probably lack the ability to run a home server so maybe my point is moot 😅

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    What is the cost of hosting a server like this? I'd imagine someone could cloud host it at a cost of $10/mo and sell the online service at $1-$2/mo, which would take very few users to turn a profit. If the code is FOSS, some people would be willing to pay for the service.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments