BrainWorms

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

Both of those sources are known to constantly spout disinformation, and their "evidence" seems tenuous at best.

hideshow 4 child comments

parent

[+] Menteros@lemm.ee -10 points 2 years ago

https://capitalresearch.org/article/nea-counsels-school-districts-to-hide-gender-transitions-from-parents/

parent

[+] Menteros@lemm.ee -10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Where "disinformation" = News that the left doesn't like, I agree.

And we have proof that this is exactly the definition used by the left to censor Twitter and the rest of mainstream internet.

hideshow 4 child comments

parent

[–] jmankman@lemmy.myserv.one 9 points 2 years ago

Imagine unironically sourcing PragerU for any reason and expecting to look smart for it

parent

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

No, I mean that nothing in the article is proof that that's what they're doing, they're only hiding the fact that the children are trans from their parents if that's what the children want, and helping children that are trans by giving them counseling or whatever. Even those articles have no proof of what they're claiming is happening

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[+] Menteros@lemm.ee -8 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

"No proof" aka "I don't have any logical response to your facts so I'm going to pretend they aren't real."

If you stick your head in the sand even further, you won't see any light at all.

https://capitalresearch.org/article/nea-counsels-school-districts-to-hide-gender-transitions-from-parents/

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[–] null@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago*

"No proof" aka your "source" doesn't back up your bold claim that "schools are pressuring kids into transitioning"

Instead of posting it over and over, you should try actually reading it.