▲ 388 ▼ Real meat vs Beyond meat (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago by Patuleia@lemmy.world to c/foodporn@lemmy.world 217 comments fedilink hide all child comments Round 1: grilled
[+] harpuajim@lemmy.ml -7 points 3 years ago (3 children) Except the vegan option is equally or more unhealthy depending on what kind of ground beef you choose. permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] woodnote@lemm.ee 10 points 3 years ago But much healthier for the cow, which I think is the reason a lot of folks are interested. Those eating plant-based for health alone are probably more likely to go for a lentil or black bean patty than Beyond/Impossible Meat. permalink fedilink source parent [–] stalfoss@lemm.ee 9 points 3 years ago Oreos and Doritos are also vegan, just because somethings vegan doesn’t mean it’s healthy, pretty sure most people with a little bit of sense understand this already permalink fedilink source parent [–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) They are not marketed as a healthy alternative. They are significantly better for the environment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world -5 points 3 years ago (1 child) They're not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago Significantly lower carbon emissions and significantly lower water usage. Where are you getting that they are not better for the environment? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] woodnote@lemm.ee 10 points 3 years ago But much healthier for the cow, which I think is the reason a lot of folks are interested. Those eating plant-based for health alone are probably more likely to go for a lentil or black bean patty than Beyond/Impossible Meat. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stalfoss@lemm.ee 9 points 3 years ago Oreos and Doritos are also vegan, just because somethings vegan doesn’t mean it’s healthy, pretty sure most people with a little bit of sense understand this already permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) They are not marketed as a healthy alternative. They are significantly better for the environment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world -5 points 3 years ago (1 child) They're not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago Significantly lower carbon emissions and significantly lower water usage. Where are you getting that they are not better for the environment? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Aux@lemmy.world -5 points 3 years ago (1 child) They're not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago Significantly lower carbon emissions and significantly lower water usage. Where are you getting that they are not better for the environment? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago Significantly lower carbon emissions and significantly lower water usage. Where are you getting that they are not better for the environment? permalink fedilink source parent
