1365
Don't let the corporations tell you otherwise (lemmy.ohaa.xyz)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/memes@lemmy.world
331 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Agreed if you have enough financial stability to do so.

Digital Piracy is always right when you are poor when a sale to acces a copy isn’t possible no one loses anything from acquiring it for free and if anyone deserves free game and movie entertainment to distract them from perpetual hardship its the poor.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That doesn't make any sense. Ok yes let's help disadvantaged people of course, but still.

    Someone has to make the content and someone has to pay for it: devs gotta eat and the fair cost may be less than game retail, but it's always greater than zero. If the cost isn't fair, dont buy, or at least dont pretend you're entitled to it. If the original costs X, and there are Y "free copies" of it, everyone owes X / (Y + 1), or some angel investor owes the whole total for all of us.

    How about museums and parks? Any new person walking through doesn't incur any (or minimal cost) to experience, and hell, some museums are free or have voluntary donations! That model is possible because of taxes and donations/fundraising/auctions to provide a public service. If Gabe Newell is going to finance a game, sure, you and any impoverished friend can have a free copy. For the game ecosystem now, you and every friend getting a free copy means 1 of 2 things:

    1. To get the next game, all of us paying for it get to be charged a larger share of fair price than if you also paid (even if things are totally fairly priced), OR

    2. We don't get a next game because revenue was too low.

    As an individual it totally doesn't matter, but if everybody came to this way of thinking then nobody is gonna pay but basically everyone will still want the content.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    For the record i do pay creators that make the stuff i enjoy because i am not impoverished and i recognize that within this economy i am the group that should support their livelihoods.

    The way i see it when it comes to the poor only 2 options exist.

    • poor person cant afford to purchase the game so valve gets 0 dollars and the poor feel worse because they see everyone enjoying this thing they are financially excluded from

    • the poor person obtains a free copy, valve gets the same 0 dollars but now the poor person can be included within the games community, potentially aiding its popularity. Absolutely nothing is lost.

    Currently everyone who want to pirate can do so, and yet creators still exists, evidently enough people are paying to maintain it.

    I understand your argument in context of a functional fair economy but i am an anti-capitalist

    I know you may disagree with this and i respect the focus in wanting to make the current system work but ultimately my ideal is that the means to live should be separate from our productivity. If food, healthcare, housing, family and entertainment are all guaranteed. Then a creator does not need money to share their work. They can create because they want to create because they enjoy to create. And the face that people would copy and enjoy their work is the highest form of flattery as it means people really like what you do/make. The enjoyment of those people becomes the creators contributing to society.

    You may think that people wouldn’t do some work anymore but that is where i would wholeheartedly disagree. Many people would do volunteer work if they didn’t need a job, i would still do the very same thing for free that i am getting paid for now but arguably id be even more motivated because id feel like i am helping the community rather then having it be a business transaction for personal gain.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I respect that perspective, and hey some games even say "yeah pirate it and share it with your friends who might buy". The place I still would have issue is that the society you're discussing does t exist NOW in the US so it's a little unfair to live by how things would be if the world were perfect.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    I am not sure what you mean. I am not vouching for people that buy games now to stop and become pirates. I also sincerely hope no one has forgone a daily hot meal or sold a kidney just to obtain a game which can be pirated.

    Piracy does exists right now in the us and many people do so; i have yet to see it being the main factor of a studio going bankrupt.

    Its an indication that most people are willing to do the right thing which is a different thing depending on their socio-economic circles.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    To simplify, it would be nice if everyone got a universal provision for food, housing, and money, but they don't. Your argument is that "if we had these basic things, there's no reason not to have X game for free."

    BUT, we don't yet have those things. That makes it not fair to just take it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Thats really isn’t my argument though.

    I am absolutely not saying people should pirate simply because of some ideal, before that ideal exists.

    I have been saying that within the current system all people with enough means to live comfortably ought to pay a fair share to creators, as am i.

    I am not sure why this mis communication persists i thought to have clarified it at least 3 times now that that is not what i meant.

    Have a good (probably next) day now.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Big tangent here, but

    They can create because they want to create because they enjoy to create.

    Okay so now everyone is a creator, who manages them? Who deals with distribution, with bugfixes, with all the tiny minutiae in Yung modern world?

    My job is that I maintain the electrical power that goes to the servers that host the software that people use to create. No one has a "passion" for power and cooling system maintenance, but it's an absolute necessity even in a fully automated world. Someone has to make sure the robots are working. Who has a passion for creating a controls monitoring system that is 2% faster and 8% more efficient than the previous iteration? Who will decide to create, in their spare time, one tenth of one percent of one percent of one project that eventually becomes the next iphone? Who will volunteers their time to make sure tickets are routed properly between these departments? Who lies awake at night wishing they were independently wealthy so they could have the time and energy to tell people that their poor performance is hurting a project and the project doesn't want them anymore?

    You envision a world where there are billions of artists and no one who knows how to replace the insulation in your attic, or would do it if they could.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    I don't think everyone has a passion for art either.

    Honestly your picked the wrong person to lay out this particular example :), no offence.

    I have a very big passion for creating small % efficiency every iteration. In fact i refuse to do any task any other way. If i am not improving the flow of a task every time i do it then my talents are being wasted. As long as i can do such improvements even the most repetitive menial tasks are fun. Ive nevee had a task go stale besides when a bosses specifically barred me from looking for potential improvements.

    Ive spend much free time to specifically tweak the airflow and temps of my desktop. I absolutely wouldn’t mind to use those skills elsewhere.

    Some people get annoyed knowing something is broken/not perfect and get a kick out of solving that no matter what its about.

    Some of the stuff you mentioned like routing tickets and much of the work i do know can soon be automated by ai and robots.

    I very much agree robots need human oversight/caretakers but it again confused me that there be no people willing to this. Most fellow nerds love robots, some already build and improve them as a hobby, seems only natural that the opportunity to use that skill for a greater good can be even more rewarding.

    I am sorry to hear you dont seem to feel this kind of excitement with your job now. I am not sure how you became burned out or where nudged in a career path doesn’t interest you.

    I am not assuming your actual personal ability to do a great job but i admit that the fact many people aren’t excited about their job is something that worries me towards work quality. If i wasn’t I would not trust myself to get optimal results.

    My hope is that once your livelihood is guaranteed without work income you no longer feel pressure to do what you don’t love so you can go out, discover what you do love and find there is almost certainly something you can do that you are passioned about that can be used helping society rather then just yourself.

    I know a few fellow jobless autists with untapped potential as they were failed by the school system that would love a chance to work in your industry.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    That's so incredibly naive. I'm not even mad at you, I just feel sorry for you. You seem like a bright and hopeful person but if you keep looking for this version of society you will constantly be disappointed.

    I'll just say, there are a lot of people who like their jobs. I'm actually one of them. Almost none of those people enjoy their jobs enough that they would choose to work rather than not work, for no additional gain. Maybe you're one of that tiny sliver of people. But if so, there's not enough of you to keep society functioning, much less progressing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Don't worry i know my ideals naive. And i admit that that and the desire to do what is correct (subjective), regardless of personal gain is related to my and common in autism and other neurodivergent.

    Believe it or not if wed have some long in person conversations you'll find i have many more nuanced related opinions and ideas on how to do things differently that are very hard to explain in text. What i want isn’t feasible without many many overhauls on all levels of society, starting with the values we foster in our children.

    A gross summary of many of it is that if you aim for perfection you maintain focused on getting as close to it as you can. This state of knowing i/we are doing the best we can is my zen area where i can truly Focus. Things will never be perfect, to me that is perfect as there will always be some problem to solve and something that feels worth doing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    There is enough open source and free and dirt cheap content available already that you can't play in a lifetime. While I agree that stuff that's too expensive for the majority of people shouldn't even exist, I don't see why creative content should be free for the taking in a society that doesn't support that way of life yet. Unless you also agree that people should be allowed to take everything else for free as well.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago*

    To quote the meme “if you see people steal food, diapers or medicine, no you did not”

    I wouldn’t call it free for the taking because i still believe that under the current system all people with the means to pay, should pay. And thats also what i mostly observe in real life.

    I am also against people taking and legally buying more then what they/relatives really need. There is way to much wasted around us, even properties.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Because you can only afford tofu doesn't make it ok to steal a steak.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    If we could produce infinite free steaks, then yes, it is ok.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    So in that scenario we can produce infinite steaks, right?

    Now, people start stealing those steaks because we can produce an infinite amount of them, infinite supply = cost should be zero.

    Now, tell me... What's the incentive for the steak producer to continue producing those steaks if people aren't paying for them?

    See where I'm going with that?

    In the end of doesn't matter if an infinite quantity can be produced "for free", there's people behind the product that pay the price and no matter how you want to justify it, if you don't respect the way the creator wants to give access to their product to people, you have no moral ground to stand on.

    I'm not saying people don't do it, I'm saying that trying to justify it to make you feel better about it is pure hypocrisy and just wrong.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    That's objectively untrue due to the case study of what's actually happening in real life though. You CAN steal as many steaks as you want, and people ARE paying, at least for the good ones. Enough to fund giant companies that produce more steaks.

    if you don’t respect the way the creator wants to give access to their product to people, you have no moral ground to stand on.

    Sometimes the creator is wrong. Monopolies are wrong. Slave labor is wrong. Massive environmental externalities are wrong. In many cases, these things are not illegal, but they should be. Same goes for restrictions on purchases of digital media. It's wrong, and we shouldn't respect it. That's the moral high ground.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    "Slave labor is wrong" says the guy who doesn't want to pay for the labor of the people providing him with content.

    If you don't agree with the way it's distributed then skip it entirely, that's the only way you've got the moral high ground.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    “Slave labor is wrong” says the guy who doesn’t want to pay for the labor of the people providing him with content.

    Are they providing me with content though? When that media inevitably becomes unusable due to their policies, do I get a refund? Historically, no.

    Which is, by the way, not legal, so producers have neither the moral nor the legal high ground if you think about it. They do have better lawyers though.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Are they providing me with content though?

    I don't know what you're pirating if it's not content created by other people

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    And hence, you discover the point of the meme. Full circle. I love it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    I don't think you understand what I meant...

    People create what you're pirating, the games, music, movies that you're illegally downloading have been created by people who need to make a living.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    But are they providing that to me in exchange for payment. Arguably, no. That's the point of the meme.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    They are offering it and if you disagree with the way it's being offered to you, you're not entitled to procure it through other means.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    I disagree.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    So if you start making chairs using wood you find in a forest close to where you live and selling them on Marketplace, I can come over, enter your garage and just take them without giving you a cent and you won't do a thing because I can tell you "I disagree with your price and your decision to sell them through a Meta platform, but I still want the chairs and I know you can make more of them and you don't pay for the material anyway." and you'll look at me with a smile and tell me "You're right buddy, you're entitled to them if you feel like they should be yours!"

    You've got the maturity of a child that acts like the whole world revolves around them and that thinks they're entitled to everything they want no matter the impact on others.

    The worst part being that it just shows your lack of conviction, you're unable make the sacrifices that come with what you preach, you would rather have your cake and eat it too and then pretend that it's morally correct so you don't have to feel guilty about having no self control.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago*

    So if you start making chairs using wood you find in a forest close to where you live and selling them on Marketplace, I can come over, enter your garage and just take them without giving you a cent

    No, but you're free to come over and use your fancy chair copying machine to make a copy and keep that for yourself while still leaving me the original. If you like the chair, I'd appreciate a donation, most people think $x is a fair amount.

    you would rather have your cake and eat it too

    That's how digital copies work. You can have your cake and eat it too. You can make infinite cake for essentially free.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I am good friends with someone who works with detained criminals and thats not how most thievery happens. Besides alcohol (but addiction is a different story) baby food is the item most often stolen. Packages of sliced cheese are also common.

    The criminal poor don’t go to the store to steal specific items they go to buy food like normal and with every item they are counting if they will have enough on their account. When they get to their budget limit they try to swap some stuff to make It work. If that really doesn’t work they sometimes decide to take a more expansive items from their cart and smuggle it out without paying.

    Of course this wont be the exact scenario for all store-theft but its what i hear is most common at least where i live.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    What I'm saying is that there's plenty of cheap games you can play, even tons of free ones (one a week on epic) if you don't have enough money. It doesn't make it morally right to pirate games.

    I know people do it, I do it too, trying to pass it as being somehow morally right is what I can't accept. I'm at fault, I accept it and don't try to make myself believe that it's ok, it's not.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    I see where you are coming from.

    Doing something wrong and realizing it is wrong is a really important skill to have as its part of the guilt mechanisms which is important in a healthy society.

    I am going to settle on i agree on what you say here specifically but i disagree that there isn’t more to discuss within the same topic about what is and isn’t morally right. Which admittedly is something that would requires a much bigger body of people to weigh in on.

    Wishing you well!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    I primarily use it to see if things are actually worth me paying for them, I've lost count of the games I've tried out, found they were great and bought outright. Watching things is more of a service issue though, I'll pay a subscription for something if it's actually decent, Netflix went and screwed that up for me. If I could actually trust any of the streaming services to not do something stupid again then maybe I would.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent