▲ 846 ▼ Fake news, fake penis... (startrek.website) submitted 2 years ago by AnonWyo@startrek.website to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 117 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) The only negative thing I see there is Brian's rather backwards moralist judgement. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) I find the projection in these comments fascinating. It's someone joking about an embarrassing gaffe, not a moral judgement or anything close to slut shaming. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sukhmel@programming.dev -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) It may not be a moral judgement, but it certainly equates shitty time and having dildo in your interview background. Almost as if it was shaming, or I don't really know what else to attribute that to permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] saigot@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) There's a big difference between recognizing something will lead to a bad time and thinking it should lead to bad time. Like I really hope they don't have a public way to contact them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago Thanks for the explanation, now I see what I have missed. I guess, if the tweet author had all the internet warriors in mind when writing the comment, it was a correct assessment. In that case I don't see a reason to pull that story out on twitter which could easily rekindle the negative attention to the person in the photo permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) I find the projection in these comments fascinating. It's someone joking about an embarrassing gaffe, not a moral judgement or anything close to slut shaming. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sukhmel@programming.dev -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) It may not be a moral judgement, but it certainly equates shitty time and having dildo in your interview background. Almost as if it was shaming, or I don't really know what else to attribute that to permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] saigot@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) There's a big difference between recognizing something will lead to a bad time and thinking it should lead to bad time. Like I really hope they don't have a public way to contact them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago Thanks for the explanation, now I see what I have missed. I guess, if the tweet author had all the internet warriors in mind when writing the comment, it was a correct assessment. In that case I don't see a reason to pull that story out on twitter which could easily rekindle the negative attention to the person in the photo permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sukhmel@programming.dev -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) It may not be a moral judgement, but it certainly equates shitty time and having dildo in your interview background. Almost as if it was shaming, or I don't really know what else to attribute that to permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] saigot@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) There's a big difference between recognizing something will lead to a bad time and thinking it should lead to bad time. Like I really hope they don't have a public way to contact them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago Thanks for the explanation, now I see what I have missed. I guess, if the tweet author had all the internet warriors in mind when writing the comment, it was a correct assessment. In that case I don't see a reason to pull that story out on twitter which could easily rekindle the negative attention to the person in the photo permalink fedilink source parent
[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) There's a big difference between recognizing something will lead to a bad time and thinking it should lead to bad time. Like I really hope they don't have a public way to contact them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago Thanks for the explanation, now I see what I have missed. I guess, if the tweet author had all the internet warriors in mind when writing the comment, it was a correct assessment. In that case I don't see a reason to pull that story out on twitter which could easily rekindle the negative attention to the person in the photo permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago Thanks for the explanation, now I see what I have missed. I guess, if the tweet author had all the internet warriors in mind when writing the comment, it was a correct assessment. In that case I don't see a reason to pull that story out on twitter which could easily rekindle the negative attention to the person in the photo permalink fedilink source parent
