▲ 88 ▼ Why DisplayPort Is Still Better Than HDMI (www.youtube.com) submitted 3 years ago by BearPear@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.ml 64 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] sift@lemmy.world 28 points 3 years ago (6 children) If I use display port for 2 monitors, when my system sleeps, all of the windows forget where they've been placed and I have to move each one back into position. 2x HDMI doesn't have that issue. Until that changes, display port is unusable for me. permalink fedilink source hideshow 12 child comments replies: [+] ladel@feddit.uk 39 points 3 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] uninvitedguest@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 years ago I have a similar issue that when my monitors connected by display port are put to sleep, the computer treats it like they have been disconnected completely - and hence all my windows get shoved around. This is with a laptop with its screen option, hooked up to a DP monitor by USB C adapter. I would love to switch to DP but this prevents me. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 30 points 3 years ago (1 child) This is a windows bug. Are you still on win10? It's fixed in 11. https://devblogs.microsoft.com/directx/avoid-unexpected-app-rearrangement/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sift@lemmy.world 12 points 3 years ago (1 child) Well I'll be. Yes, I'm still on Windows 10. I suppose now I have a reason to consider updating. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 years ago (2 children) Not really recommending this downgrade permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Install https://github.com/valinet/ExplorerPatcher/ and then it's better than windows 10. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Why yes, let me run some untrusted software as admin from Github patching a central part of my OS while I don't even know what it does! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Juat read the open source code, duh permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Or the developers could write a proper readme and at least tell me what the software is for. If you can't even bother to do that, I'll gladly miss out on your software. Who knows what other surprises you just ignored. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Here we go https://github.com/valinet/ExplorerPatcher/wiki permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Why can't this be in the README, which is the first thing you see when opening the repository? Developers who hide stuff like that don't make me want to install their software. They could literally paste that wiki startpage into the README and I wouldn't have complained. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 3 years ago I totally agree! permalink fedilink source parent [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Seems like it got proper documentation. I guess you just cope. I more often I see weird projects that only offer binaries that people just recommend me or even the school, I would rather trust Open Source code that has less documentation than a binary only project with little documentation. I don't even trust Microsoft binaries. Its always malware because its very malicious to send so much telemetry without asking me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Use Linux then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago What do you think I do permalink fedilink source parent [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago I installed Windows 11 AME on my Windows 11 and generally I hate too much things about it in general, but it has nothing to do with AME, it actually improved the experience by a bit, but Windows still has too many issues to just stay at Win 10 permalink fedilink source parent [–] exscape@kbin.social 12 points 3 years ago It's mind-boggling to me that this hasn't been fixed (in Windows, I assume?), people have been complaining for years. It's not inherent to DisplayPort though. Some monitors that suffer from this issue can disable "deep sleep" and have the issue gone even with DisplayPort, but not all monitors allow turning it off. (And others yet, like my old Acer XB271HU, doesn't have the issue to begin with.) permalink fedilink source parent [–] Jumper775@lemmy.world 11 points 3 years ago Works on Linux (gnome) permalink fedilink source parent [+] fat_flying_pigs@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] HellAwaits@lemm.ee 0 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ladel@feddit.uk 39 points 3 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] uninvitedguest@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 years ago I have a similar issue that when my monitors connected by display port are put to sleep, the computer treats it like they have been disconnected completely - and hence all my windows get shoved around. This is with a laptop with its screen option, hooked up to a DP monitor by USB C adapter. I would love to switch to DP but this prevents me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] uninvitedguest@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 years ago I have a similar issue that when my monitors connected by display port are put to sleep, the computer treats it like they have been disconnected completely - and hence all my windows get shoved around. This is with a laptop with its screen option, hooked up to a DP monitor by USB C adapter. I would love to switch to DP but this prevents me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 30 points 3 years ago (1 child) This is a windows bug. Are you still on win10? It's fixed in 11. https://devblogs.microsoft.com/directx/avoid-unexpected-app-rearrangement/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sift@lemmy.world 12 points 3 years ago (1 child) Well I'll be. Yes, I'm still on Windows 10. I suppose now I have a reason to consider updating. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 years ago (2 children) Not really recommending this downgrade permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Install https://github.com/valinet/ExplorerPatcher/ and then it's better than windows 10. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Why yes, let me run some untrusted software as admin from Github patching a central part of my OS while I don't even know what it does! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Juat read the open source code, duh permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Or the developers could write a proper readme and at least tell me what the software is for. If you can't even bother to do that, I'll gladly miss out on your software. Who knows what other surprises you just ignored. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Here we go https://github.com/valinet/ExplorerPatcher/wiki permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Why can't this be in the README, which is the first thing you see when opening the repository? Developers who hide stuff like that don't make me want to install their software. They could literally paste that wiki startpage into the README and I wouldn't have complained. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 3 years ago I totally agree! permalink fedilink source parent [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Seems like it got proper documentation. I guess you just cope. I more often I see weird projects that only offer binaries that people just recommend me or even the school, I would rather trust Open Source code that has less documentation than a binary only project with little documentation. I don't even trust Microsoft binaries. Its always malware because its very malicious to send so much telemetry without asking me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Use Linux then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago What do you think I do permalink fedilink source parent [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago I installed Windows 11 AME on my Windows 11 and generally I hate too much things about it in general, but it has nothing to do with AME, it actually improved the experience by a bit, but Windows still has too many issues to just stay at Win 10 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sift@lemmy.world 12 points 3 years ago (1 child) Well I'll be. Yes, I'm still on Windows 10. I suppose now I have a reason to consider updating. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 years ago (2 children) Not really recommending this downgrade permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Install https://github.com/valinet/ExplorerPatcher/ and then it's better than windows 10. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Why yes, let me run some untrusted software as admin from Github patching a central part of my OS while I don't even know what it does! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Juat read the open source code, duh permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Or the developers could write a proper readme and at least tell me what the software is for. If you can't even bother to do that, I'll gladly miss out on your software. Who knows what other surprises you just ignored. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Here we go https://github.com/valinet/ExplorerPatcher/wiki permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Why can't this be in the README, which is the first thing you see when opening the repository? Developers who hide stuff like that don't make me want to install their software. They could literally paste that wiki startpage into the README and I wouldn't have complained. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 3 years ago I totally agree! permalink fedilink source parent [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Seems like it got proper documentation. I guess you just cope. I more often I see weird projects that only offer binaries that people just recommend me or even the school, I would rather trust Open Source code that has less documentation than a binary only project with little documentation. I don't even trust Microsoft binaries. Its always malware because its very malicious to send so much telemetry without asking me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Use Linux then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago What do you think I do permalink fedilink source parent [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago I installed Windows 11 AME on my Windows 11 and generally I hate too much things about it in general, but it has nothing to do with AME, it actually improved the experience by a bit, but Windows still has too many issues to just stay at Win 10 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 years ago (2 children) Not really recommending this downgrade permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Install https://github.com/valinet/ExplorerPatcher/ and then it's better than windows 10. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Why yes, let me run some untrusted software as admin from Github patching a central part of my OS while I don't even know what it does! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Juat read the open source code, duh permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Or the developers could write a proper readme and at least tell me what the software is for. If you can't even bother to do that, I'll gladly miss out on your software. Who knows what other surprises you just ignored. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Here we go https://github.com/valinet/ExplorerPatcher/wiki permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Why can't this be in the README, which is the first thing you see when opening the repository? Developers who hide stuff like that don't make me want to install their software. They could literally paste that wiki startpage into the README and I wouldn't have complained. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 3 years ago I totally agree! permalink fedilink source parent [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Seems like it got proper documentation. I guess you just cope. I more often I see weird projects that only offer binaries that people just recommend me or even the school, I would rather trust Open Source code that has less documentation than a binary only project with little documentation. I don't even trust Microsoft binaries. Its always malware because its very malicious to send so much telemetry without asking me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Use Linux then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago What do you think I do permalink fedilink source parent [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago I installed Windows 11 AME on my Windows 11 and generally I hate too much things about it in general, but it has nothing to do with AME, it actually improved the experience by a bit, but Windows still has too many issues to just stay at Win 10 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Install https://github.com/valinet/ExplorerPatcher/ and then it's better than windows 10. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Why yes, let me run some untrusted software as admin from Github patching a central part of my OS while I don't even know what it does! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Juat read the open source code, duh permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Or the developers could write a proper readme and at least tell me what the software is for. If you can't even bother to do that, I'll gladly miss out on your software. Who knows what other surprises you just ignored. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Here we go https://github.com/valinet/ExplorerPatcher/wiki permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Why can't this be in the README, which is the first thing you see when opening the repository? Developers who hide stuff like that don't make me want to install their software. They could literally paste that wiki startpage into the README and I wouldn't have complained. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 3 years ago I totally agree! permalink fedilink source parent [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Seems like it got proper documentation. I guess you just cope. I more often I see weird projects that only offer binaries that people just recommend me or even the school, I would rather trust Open Source code that has less documentation than a binary only project with little documentation. I don't even trust Microsoft binaries. Its always malware because its very malicious to send so much telemetry without asking me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Use Linux then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago What do you think I do permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Helix@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Why yes, let me run some untrusted software as admin from Github patching a central part of my OS while I don't even know what it does! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Juat read the open source code, duh permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Or the developers could write a proper readme and at least tell me what the software is for. If you can't even bother to do that, I'll gladly miss out on your software. Who knows what other surprises you just ignored. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Here we go https://github.com/valinet/ExplorerPatcher/wiki permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Why can't this be in the README, which is the first thing you see when opening the repository? Developers who hide stuff like that don't make me want to install their software. They could literally paste that wiki startpage into the README and I wouldn't have complained. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 3 years ago I totally agree! permalink fedilink source parent [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Seems like it got proper documentation. I guess you just cope. I more often I see weird projects that only offer binaries that people just recommend me or even the school, I would rather trust Open Source code that has less documentation than a binary only project with little documentation. I don't even trust Microsoft binaries. Its always malware because its very malicious to send so much telemetry without asking me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Use Linux then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago What do you think I do permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Juat read the open source code, duh permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Or the developers could write a proper readme and at least tell me what the software is for. If you can't even bother to do that, I'll gladly miss out on your software. Who knows what other surprises you just ignored. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Here we go https://github.com/valinet/ExplorerPatcher/wiki permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Why can't this be in the README, which is the first thing you see when opening the repository? Developers who hide stuff like that don't make me want to install their software. They could literally paste that wiki startpage into the README and I wouldn't have complained. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 3 years ago I totally agree! permalink fedilink source parent [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Seems like it got proper documentation. I guess you just cope. I more often I see weird projects that only offer binaries that people just recommend me or even the school, I would rather trust Open Source code that has less documentation than a binary only project with little documentation. I don't even trust Microsoft binaries. Its always malware because its very malicious to send so much telemetry without asking me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Use Linux then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago What do you think I do permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Helix@feddit.de 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Or the developers could write a proper readme and at least tell me what the software is for. If you can't even bother to do that, I'll gladly miss out on your software. Who knows what other surprises you just ignored. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Here we go https://github.com/valinet/ExplorerPatcher/wiki permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Why can't this be in the README, which is the first thing you see when opening the repository? Developers who hide stuff like that don't make me want to install their software. They could literally paste that wiki startpage into the README and I wouldn't have complained. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 3 years ago I totally agree! permalink fedilink source parent [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Seems like it got proper documentation. I guess you just cope. I more often I see weird projects that only offer binaries that people just recommend me or even the school, I would rather trust Open Source code that has less documentation than a binary only project with little documentation. I don't even trust Microsoft binaries. Its always malware because its very malicious to send so much telemetry without asking me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Use Linux then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago What do you think I do permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Here we go https://github.com/valinet/ExplorerPatcher/wiki permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Why can't this be in the README, which is the first thing you see when opening the repository? Developers who hide stuff like that don't make me want to install their software. They could literally paste that wiki startpage into the README and I wouldn't have complained. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 3 years ago I totally agree! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Helix@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Why can't this be in the README, which is the first thing you see when opening the repository? Developers who hide stuff like that don't make me want to install their software. They could literally paste that wiki startpage into the README and I wouldn't have complained. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 3 years ago I totally agree! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 3 years ago I totally agree! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Seems like it got proper documentation. I guess you just cope. I more often I see weird projects that only offer binaries that people just recommend me or even the school, I would rather trust Open Source code that has less documentation than a binary only project with little documentation. I don't even trust Microsoft binaries. Its always malware because its very malicious to send so much telemetry without asking me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Helix@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Use Linux then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago What do you think I do permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Helix@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Use Linux then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago What do you think I do permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago I installed Windows 11 AME on my Windows 11 and generally I hate too much things about it in general, but it has nothing to do with AME, it actually improved the experience by a bit, but Windows still has too many issues to just stay at Win 10 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] exscape@kbin.social 12 points 3 years ago It's mind-boggling to me that this hasn't been fixed (in Windows, I assume?), people have been complaining for years. It's not inherent to DisplayPort though. Some monitors that suffer from this issue can disable "deep sleep" and have the issue gone even with DisplayPort, but not all monitors allow turning it off. (And others yet, like my old Acer XB271HU, doesn't have the issue to begin with.) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jumper775@lemmy.world 11 points 3 years ago Works on Linux (gnome) permalink fedilink source parent
[+] fat_flying_pigs@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] HellAwaits@lemm.ee 0 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent