you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I've got a Surface Pro 5 with the dogshit m3 processor and 4GB of Ram, anyone have any concept of how it'd run under linux? It basically folds at any real task in Windows

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Incidentally, I had the exact same device. It actually worked pretty good to be honest!

    Of course it will not magically be a top tier device. Programs will need some time to load the first time, and then be thrown out of RAM again.
    BUT, compared to Windows, it will be a difference between night and day!

    I strongly recommend you the silverblue-main-surface-image from universal-blue.org.

    Why?

    • Because you need the linux-surface-kernel for it to work. Otherwise, most functions, like touchscreen, webcam, adaptive brightness, auto-rotate and more won't work at all.
    • You can install the kernel on other distros too, but it might break. I had that already happening. On uBlue, it's baked in and won't break. And if it does, you can just roll back.
    • It comes with Gnome by default and provides you a great touchscreen experience
    • And you can install Waydroid easily, which gives you access to Android apps.

    I don't recommend using another DE than Gnome for that. Especially those "light weight" ones like XFCE are horrible for touchscreens, and if you use a browser, those few hundred MBs RAM less used by them is negotiable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It would be smooth as butter with a lightweight desktop (probably not KDE). I suggest Linux Mint XFCE edition

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Everything's about perspective... maybe GNOME became SO bloated that KDE now seems very light. :P

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Look on phoronix for benchmarks. Plasma consumes less RAM and CPU than even XFCE.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Hold on, I was kind of joking, I'm not saying KDE is slow. GNOME for sure is slow as hell.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    All good, but I think it's really often a misconception that a DE like KDE, which is big and brings tons of features, must be more ressource intensive than a (feature wise) smaller DE. Which, as the benchmarks show, is surprisingly not the case.

  • source
  • parent