▲ 320 ▼ Surface Laptop 3 running Kubuntu, such an improvement over what it was "designed" for. (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by BlovedMadman@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml 76 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Everything's about perspective... maybe GNOME became SO bloated that KDE now seems very light. :P permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aksdb@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Look on phoronix for benchmarks. Plasma consumes less RAM and CPU than even XFCE. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TCB13@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Hold on, I was kind of joking, I'm not saying KDE is slow. GNOME for sure is slow as hell. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aksdb@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago All good, but I think it's really often a misconception that a DE like KDE, which is big and brings tons of features, must be more ressource intensive than a (feature wise) smaller DE. Which, as the benchmarks show, is surprisingly not the case. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] aksdb@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Look on phoronix for benchmarks. Plasma consumes less RAM and CPU than even XFCE. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TCB13@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Hold on, I was kind of joking, I'm not saying KDE is slow. GNOME for sure is slow as hell. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aksdb@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago All good, but I think it's really often a misconception that a DE like KDE, which is big and brings tons of features, must be more ressource intensive than a (feature wise) smaller DE. Which, as the benchmarks show, is surprisingly not the case. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Hold on, I was kind of joking, I'm not saying KDE is slow. GNOME for sure is slow as hell. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aksdb@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago All good, but I think it's really often a misconception that a DE like KDE, which is big and brings tons of features, must be more ressource intensive than a (feature wise) smaller DE. Which, as the benchmarks show, is surprisingly not the case. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] aksdb@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago All good, but I think it's really often a misconception that a DE like KDE, which is big and brings tons of features, must be more ressource intensive than a (feature wise) smaller DE. Which, as the benchmarks show, is surprisingly not the case. permalink fedilink source parent
