you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 92 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This feels weird to say.... I really think Microsoft should've stuck with trident / edgehtml.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Why? Because you liked the greater browser diversity or because you think it made a better browser?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Diversity. MS had made great strides with EdgeHTML, but it was still pretty bad

    But at least opening the browser didn't take all my ram.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    And also at the very least you had another option. Which, in my opinion, wasn't that bad, at least it could've been if they just gave up on Bing and MSN.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago

    It was actually one of the most W3C compliant browsers there is, more so than chromium based ones. Unfortunately google’s near monopoly has made websites focus on working in chrome, not on standards.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    As a web developer, EdgeHTML was the source of so many bugs, including a few that were regressions, and it didn't seem like Microsoft dedicated enough resources to the Edge project.

  • source
  • parent