you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 99 points 2 years ago (17 children)

Every Democrat I know irl is a kind, considerate person with empathetic views.

So it's amazing to me that the party seems to go out of its way to find the most horrific ghouls and status quo warriors to set forth in a federal election, especially really fucking important elections

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [+] 77 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    They care about you less if you don't vote.

    If we want better candidates we should be prepping for 2028 and 2032 now. Not 2024. We have a big chance coming up. So many of the boomers that have been in control of all levels of government for the last several decades. Neocons and neoliberals are all dying out. And being forced to retire. Change is coming one way or another.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 54 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Because the parties don't represent the people. The parties represent the interests of those with most influence in the party. In the modern system it is those who make the most impactfull and sustained donation efforts. The rest is just marketing used to secure enough votes in the election show according to arbitrary rules they set and change as they see fit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    So it’s amazing to me that the party seems to go out of its way to find the most horrific ghouls and status quo warriors to set forth in a federal election, especially really fucking important elections

    I think its useful to distinguish between Democrats and democrats. I try to use Democrats for party officials, elected officials, talking heads within the party etc. I try to use democrats for democratic voters.

    Democrats do not have the priorities of their voters in mind, and have, since the 90's, wished that they actually had republicans for voters. Democrats don't want to be managing a leftwing party (the votership they largely have), they want to be managing a rightwing party. The Democratic party reconfigured its self to be diet Republican after Carter and have been failing forwards ever since.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I lived through all of that and you put it just right: They kept failing forward. If they weren't the only alternative to the Republicans the party would have died after 1984.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    It's probably obvious we need more choices but how?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    It’s the system, honestly.

    The U.S. government was always designed so that it would be ruled by ‘the top’. Through failures of imagination, inability to build in flexibility, and the entrenched powers doing what they can to grow their power, we’ve wound up with a system where money is power and people are merely numbers that can be shuffled to produce desired end results.

    I’m quickly approaching a point of throwing up my hands, but if there is a needle that can be threaded by ‘the people’ to stitch back together our fraying democracy, it’s this —
    A state-by-state ballot initiative effort to remove political drawing of electoral maps.
    Changing voting (likely also ballot initiative) to remove the first past the poll system, so that we use instant run-off (aka ranked choice) to give people the opportunity to vote for who they want without throwing their vote away.
    Removing barriers to voting and establishing a national holiday during election days.
    Overturn Citizens United. Overhaul campaign finance. Eliminate unknown funding sources from politics. Eliminate business contributions and PAC’s entirely. Narrowly define acceptable lobbying, and broadly define what lobbying can’t be.
    Strong consumer privacy laws that have teeth, so that micro targeted campaigns can’t be used to manipulate people into swinging elections. Case in point - Trump only won the swing states by 11,000 votes (total) in 2016.
    And using ballot initiatives to have enough states join the national popular vote interstate compact to render the electoral college moot.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Primaries. The people have to show up and actually vote for what they want into the primary (rather than trying to vote according to political strategies). With enough sustained effort and time a coalition of like-minded representatives could be built up to slowly change the system to a more representational one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    I suspect the DNC is gonna try another Bill Clinton style southern strategy and appeal to disenfranchised conservatives by shifting further to the right. And current democrat voters will shift to the right with them, defending their right wing actions tooth and nail.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (13 replies)
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (18 children)

    Well it's simple, what are the Democrat voters going to do, vote 3rd party?

    They're held hostage to the party, so the party has no need to reflect them, it just has to be less bad than the Republicans.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • load more comments (17 replies)
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If you don't like it, vote in the primary!

    (Unless you live in NH, then you don't get a primary. Also the DNC reserves all rights to ignore any primary election)

    Either we get rid of the two party system, or it's gonna be the death of democracy.

    There can't just be two options picked by private organizations... That's just the illusion of choice when billionaires and corporations donate to both parties.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Vote in all primaries. Vote in state and local. Vote on your local dog-catcher.

    The President isn't the only office that matters, and really it doesn't even make up a majority of the importance. It's just easier to get people to focus on it, and ignore all the other just as important elections.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • I get what you're saying, and I'm very involved locally, have even considered running myself, but then what? We've still got immigrants and refugees in concentration camps, still can't get anyone, especially women or trans youth, access to healthcare, can't redistribute wealth, can't give land back to the tribes. I still feel powerless. Now what? Just be content with that?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    "Genocide Joe" is a little crass, but he absolutely deserves to be taken to task for his blind support of the IDF/IOF. That's more important to me as a voter than hearing circle jerk promises about known positions. We know he's pro abortion rights, he's shown that. Now it's time to address the elephant in the room.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (10 children)

    So it’s amazing to me that the party seems to go out of its way to find the most horrific ghouls and status quo warriors to set forth in a federal election, especially really fucking important elections

    Can you elaborate on what you mean that "the party seems to go out of its way to find the most horrific ghouls and status quo warriors to set forth in a federal election"? Are you unaware of the fact that Biden is the incumbent President?

    He was nominated by a wide margin against a dozen other candidates (including over my preferred candidate), and elected with solid EC majority and a record number of individual votes.

    To suggest that he was somehow appointed by the party establishment, when he's simply running for reelection like almost every incumbent President in American history has done after their first term seems like a very disingenuous statement. It's interesting that nobody leveled that argument against Trump when he ran for reelection in 2020, not to mention every other time it's happened, considering it's been the norm for decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
  • load more comments (8 replies)