you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Your opinion, not a fact. Most art is as derivative or more than AI art.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -22 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    No, that's fact. AI-generated images aren't art. They're hallucinations without meaning or purpose.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Just because some creator (or in your words hallucinator) did not intend meaning, does not prohibit or somehow prevent any beholder to still derive or instill meaning. Your weird comment is also art. The webpage or app we are viewing it on is art. Remember this?. The definition you use may suit you personally, but words are for communicating with others, and to most others it's definition will be crucially different than yours. Consider adjusting your view or the words you use.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    What if it's 50/50 text-to-image and manual brush work?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Stupid opinion. If I ask AI to draw an image, that has no meaning or purpose? So if I did the exact same thing with a pencil then it's suddenly art? AI is just a tool and people like you need to get over it or fully commit and say anything digital isn't art because a computer really did it. Anything made in Photoshop can't be art according to you because a program made it. Blender renders aren't art because a computer generated it. All you did in either case was tell it what to do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Do you reply to people this way in person ?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments