▲ 920 ▼ Alec Baldwin charged for shooting; (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by Godric@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 101 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (2 children) Baldwin didn't "show up to do a job." He was a producer on the film, not just an actor. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 years ago Producer is a broad term, there are many producers for a movie. He was likely just overseeing casting and other actor stuff. permalink fedilink source parent [–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly. It happened on his set by his hand. Makes a bit more of a tough situation permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) No it doesn't. If I cut the brakes in your car and it causes you to run into someone, then it's my fault, not yours. Edit: you know who else could be found viable? The service person who checked the vehicle before you took it on the road and allowed it through despite nonfunctional breaks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] heckypecky@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) A gun's purpose is to kill people, a car's is not. The analogy is flawed. Still, assuming you have mandatory regular inspections of cars in the US, imagine you are an experienced mechanic by profession. Someone lends you a car and says it's safe but you know immediately this rustbucket hasn't been to an inspection in decades. By experience and papers. But you drive in a public space anyways and kill someone due to a fault that would have been found during an inspection. It is 100% your fault. As I understand it, following safety procedures would have prevented this death, in the same way nonfunctional brakes would certainly be found during service. On a side note, as an electrician who has to sign documents that electrical devices are safe to use, if one of those devices kills someone and I can prove that I followed protocol during testing, I am in the clear. Following rules makes the difference between a tragic accident and negligence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Menteros@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago A gun’s purpose is to kill people Spoken like a true psychopath. A gun's purpose is to provide safety and utility to the bearer. "Killing people" that are attempting to harm you is called self-defense and is totally legal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 years ago Producer is a broad term, there are many producers for a movie. He was likely just overseeing casting and other actor stuff. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly. It happened on his set by his hand. Makes a bit more of a tough situation permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) No it doesn't. If I cut the brakes in your car and it causes you to run into someone, then it's my fault, not yours. Edit: you know who else could be found viable? The service person who checked the vehicle before you took it on the road and allowed it through despite nonfunctional breaks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] heckypecky@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) A gun's purpose is to kill people, a car's is not. The analogy is flawed. Still, assuming you have mandatory regular inspections of cars in the US, imagine you are an experienced mechanic by profession. Someone lends you a car and says it's safe but you know immediately this rustbucket hasn't been to an inspection in decades. By experience and papers. But you drive in a public space anyways and kill someone due to a fault that would have been found during an inspection. It is 100% your fault. As I understand it, following safety procedures would have prevented this death, in the same way nonfunctional brakes would certainly be found during service. On a side note, as an electrician who has to sign documents that electrical devices are safe to use, if one of those devices kills someone and I can prove that I followed protocol during testing, I am in the clear. Following rules makes the difference between a tragic accident and negligence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Menteros@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago A gun’s purpose is to kill people Spoken like a true psychopath. A gun's purpose is to provide safety and utility to the bearer. "Killing people" that are attempting to harm you is called self-defense and is totally legal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) No it doesn't. If I cut the brakes in your car and it causes you to run into someone, then it's my fault, not yours. Edit: you know who else could be found viable? The service person who checked the vehicle before you took it on the road and allowed it through despite nonfunctional breaks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] heckypecky@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) A gun's purpose is to kill people, a car's is not. The analogy is flawed. Still, assuming you have mandatory regular inspections of cars in the US, imagine you are an experienced mechanic by profession. Someone lends you a car and says it's safe but you know immediately this rustbucket hasn't been to an inspection in decades. By experience and papers. But you drive in a public space anyways and kill someone due to a fault that would have been found during an inspection. It is 100% your fault. As I understand it, following safety procedures would have prevented this death, in the same way nonfunctional brakes would certainly be found during service. On a side note, as an electrician who has to sign documents that electrical devices are safe to use, if one of those devices kills someone and I can prove that I followed protocol during testing, I am in the clear. Following rules makes the difference between a tragic accident and negligence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Menteros@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago A gun’s purpose is to kill people Spoken like a true psychopath. A gun's purpose is to provide safety and utility to the bearer. "Killing people" that are attempting to harm you is called self-defense and is totally legal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] heckypecky@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) A gun's purpose is to kill people, a car's is not. The analogy is flawed. Still, assuming you have mandatory regular inspections of cars in the US, imagine you are an experienced mechanic by profession. Someone lends you a car and says it's safe but you know immediately this rustbucket hasn't been to an inspection in decades. By experience and papers. But you drive in a public space anyways and kill someone due to a fault that would have been found during an inspection. It is 100% your fault. As I understand it, following safety procedures would have prevented this death, in the same way nonfunctional brakes would certainly be found during service. On a side note, as an electrician who has to sign documents that electrical devices are safe to use, if one of those devices kills someone and I can prove that I followed protocol during testing, I am in the clear. Following rules makes the difference between a tragic accident and negligence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Menteros@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago A gun’s purpose is to kill people Spoken like a true psychopath. A gun's purpose is to provide safety and utility to the bearer. "Killing people" that are attempting to harm you is called self-defense and is totally legal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Menteros@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago A gun’s purpose is to kill people Spoken like a true psychopath. A gun's purpose is to provide safety and utility to the bearer. "Killing people" that are attempting to harm you is called self-defense and is totally legal. permalink fedilink source parent