submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

A gun's purpose is to kill people, a car's is not. The analogy is flawed.

Still, assuming you have mandatory regular inspections of cars in the US, imagine you are an experienced mechanic by profession. Someone lends you a car and says it's safe but you know immediately this rustbucket hasn't been to an inspection in decades. By experience and papers. But you drive in a public space anyways and kill someone due to a fault that would have been found during an inspection. It is 100% your fault.

As I understand it, following safety procedures would have prevented this death, in the same way nonfunctional brakes would certainly be found during service.

On a side note, as an electrician who has to sign documents that electrical devices are safe to use, if one of those devices kills someone and I can prove that I followed protocol during testing, I am in the clear. Following rules makes the difference between a tragic accident and negligence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago

    A gun’s purpose is to kill people

    Spoken like a true psychopath.

    A gun's purpose is to provide safety and utility to the bearer. "Killing people" that are attempting to harm you is called self-defense and is totally legal.

  • source
  • parent