▲ 750 ▼ Cable Firms to FTC: We Shouldn’t Have to Let Users Cancel Service With a Click (www.wired.com) submitted 2 years ago by dantheclamman@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 111 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Wogi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) I used to work at an Internet provider that offers a discounted auto pay program. No, at least not there. Every once in a while we'd get complaints that a card wasn't working and it was because they were trying to use a gift card, and the system recognized gift cards and declined them immediately. Needed to be a credit or debit card with your name on it. Or at least someone's name on it. Who payed didn't matter, but a real person would be billed every month. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Good point here. permalink fedilink source parent [–] squidspinachfootball@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago I've thought about using them like that as someone without access to privacy.com, but they do charge an activation fee and other random little fees I didn't want to deal with. So I just... didn't buy whatever it was I was considering at the time lol. Always keeping an eye open to see if there are any alternatives though. permalink fedilink source parent [–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago In the US, gift cards will often be declined for setting up ongoing transactions. Every transaction has a merchant code associated with it and many subscriptions and services will read the merchant code and reject it on that basis alone. Doesn't matter how much of a balance the card carries. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) I used to work at an Internet provider that offers a discounted auto pay program. No, at least not there. Every once in a while we'd get complaints that a card wasn't working and it was because they were trying to use a gift card, and the system recognized gift cards and declined them immediately. Needed to be a credit or debit card with your name on it. Or at least someone's name on it. Who payed didn't matter, but a real person would be billed every month. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Good point here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Good point here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] squidspinachfootball@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago I've thought about using them like that as someone without access to privacy.com, but they do charge an activation fee and other random little fees I didn't want to deal with. So I just... didn't buy whatever it was I was considering at the time lol. Always keeping an eye open to see if there are any alternatives though. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago In the US, gift cards will often be declined for setting up ongoing transactions. Every transaction has a merchant code associated with it and many subscriptions and services will read the merchant code and reject it on that basis alone. Doesn't matter how much of a balance the card carries. permalink fedilink source parent