▲ 667 ▼ Peak organization (startrek.website) submitted 2 years ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website [M] to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 87 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Google photos is pretty good for searching photos like this, I don't know about organizing permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) It’s incredible, though Apple is catching up. Google Photos, perfect until they report you to the cops & close your account for photos you took of your son for your doctor. (NYT / Slashdot summary) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 0ops@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've wondered about that possibility. Personally, I wouldn't want sensitive photos to touch the internet PERIOD, even if I'm the one hosting. Incognito camera mode would be a cool feature. Hit a toggle, then all photos and videos are saved to a separate, secured directory not synced to any cloud service. Maybe things in there get deleted after 30 days permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sounds a little like Signal’s note to self! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 0ops@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Woah I already had signal for work and I didn't even know that was a thing permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) It’s incredible, though Apple is catching up. Google Photos, perfect until they report you to the cops & close your account for photos you took of your son for your doctor. (NYT / Slashdot summary) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 0ops@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've wondered about that possibility. Personally, I wouldn't want sensitive photos to touch the internet PERIOD, even if I'm the one hosting. Incognito camera mode would be a cool feature. Hit a toggle, then all photos and videos are saved to a separate, secured directory not synced to any cloud service. Maybe things in there get deleted after 30 days permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sounds a little like Signal’s note to self! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 0ops@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Woah I already had signal for work and I didn't even know that was a thing permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've wondered about that possibility. Personally, I wouldn't want sensitive photos to touch the internet PERIOD, even if I'm the one hosting. Incognito camera mode would be a cool feature. Hit a toggle, then all photos and videos are saved to a separate, secured directory not synced to any cloud service. Maybe things in there get deleted after 30 days permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sounds a little like Signal’s note to self! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 0ops@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Woah I already had signal for work and I didn't even know that was a thing permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sounds a little like Signal’s note to self! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 0ops@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Woah I already had signal for work and I didn't even know that was a thing permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Woah I already had signal for work and I didn't even know that was a thing permalink fedilink source parent
