529
‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 2 years ago by [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world
320 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says::Pressure grows on artificial intelligence firms over the content used to train their products

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

There's a third solution you're overlooking.

3: OpenAI (or other) wins a judgment that AI content is not inherently a violation of copyright regardless of materials it is trained upon.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's not really about the AI content being a violation or not though is it. It's more about a corporation using copyrighted content without permission to make their product better.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If it's not a violation of copyright then this is a non-issue. You don't need permission to read books.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    AI does not “read books” and it’s completely disingenuous to compare them to humans that way.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That's certainly an opinion you have

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Backed by technical facts.

    AIs fundamentally process information differently than humans. That’s not up for debate.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yes this is an argument in my favor, you just don't understand AI/LLMs enough to know why.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I could say the same about you, considering I’ve watched you peddle false information for months about this subject.

    AI learns differently than humans. That isn’t a fact up for debate. That’s one of the few objective truths around this industry.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] -9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I work with AI every day at my job. My buddy is a literal AI researcher and we hobby-build together too.

    I'm not concerned with what you think is "objective truth" when you have no idea what you're talking about.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Ok and?

    That doesn’t mean it’s any less theft, or that you have any idea what you’re talking about.

    https://www.rws.com/blog/large-language-models-humans/

    https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/rjghymycfrMY2aRk5/llm-cognition-is-probably-not-human-like

    There’s also countless papers on google scholar that point out the differences.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •