Technology

hideshow 6 child comments

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

There's a third solution you're overlooking.

3: OpenAI (or other) wins a judgment that AI content is not inherently a violation of copyright regardless of materials it is trained upon.

parent

[–] Hedgehawk@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

It's not really about the AI content being a violation or not though is it. It's more about a corporation using copyrighted content without permission to make their product better.

parent

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

If it's not a violation of copyright then this is a non-issue. You don't need permission to read books.

parent

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

AI does not “read books” and it’s completely disingenuous to compare them to humans that way.

hideshow 4 child comments

parent

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

That's certainly an opinion you have

parent

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Backed by technical facts.

AIs fundamentally process information differently than humans. That’s not up for debate.

parent

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Yes this is an argument in my favor, you just don't understand AI/LLMs enough to know why.

parent

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I could say the same about you, considering I’ve watched you peddle false information for months about this subject.

AI learns differently than humans. That isn’t a fact up for debate. That’s one of the few objective truths around this industry.

parent

[+] SCB@lemmy.world -9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I work with AI every day at my job. My buddy is a literal AI researcher and we hobby-build together too.

I'm not concerned with what you think is "objective truth" when you have no idea what you're talking about.

hideshow 4 child comments

parent

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Ok and?

That doesn’t mean it’s any less theft, or that you have any idea what you’re talking about.

https://www.rws.com/blog/large-language-models-humans/

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/rjghymycfrMY2aRk5/llm-cognition-is-probably-not-human-like

There’s also countless papers on google scholar that point out the differences.

parent

[+] SCB@lemmy.world -9 points 2 years ago

My entire premise hinges on the fact that these papers agree with me.

parent

[–] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

You use an AI to help you come up with your talking points at your job at the IOF?

parent

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca -4 points 2 years ago

Similarly I don't read "War and Peace" and then use that to go and write "Peace and War"

parent

[–] the_ocs@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

There's no open source without copyright, only public domain

parent

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

If all is public domain, all is open source

parent

[–] the_ocs@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Open source also includes viral licenses like the GPL. Without copyright, the GPL is not enforceable.

parent

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

It doesn't have to be. One leak and the code is open for all

parent

[–] rivermonster@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago

It’s why AI ultimately will be the death of capitalism, or the dawn of the endless war against the capitalists (literally, and physically).

AI will ultimately replace most jobs, capitalism can’t work without wage slave, or antique capitalism aka feudalism… so yeah. Gonna need to move towards UBI and more utopian, or just a miserable endless bloody awful war against the capitalists.