you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

"No," depending on why the officer stopped you, could be an admission of negligence (edit: or evidence of your level of intoxication,"He was so intoxicated he didn't know why I'd pulled him over after he'd smashed into a guardrail"), if you "should have known."

Exercising your rights is not "hostile and confrontational."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Exercising your rights is perhaps not hostile and confrontational.

    Stating "I'm exercising my rights" is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    The article I linked brings up the Salinas v. Texas case. My "For some reason" was more of a sarcastic nod to me thinking that ruling is wrong, that most rights don't need to be invoked, the main reason counsel needs to be invoked is because you usually need someone else to do something (e.g. give you a phone to call your lawyer), but that doesn't apply to being silent.

  • source
  • parent