▲ 526 ▼ Taiwan reports second large-scale China air force incursion this week (www.reuters.com) submitted 3 years ago by RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml 1055 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 14 points 3 years ago (1 child) but in china you have a person that controls eveything You need to do a lot more reading if you believe this permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago* (2 children) I guess you missed the point that one person has the decision to control everything, of course there will be different groups controlling the details, but this is the person who is able to change. Just saying that I should read is pretty much stupid to say, you also just could say nothing, the message would be equal. But i just gonna be you for a moment: If you do not believe this, you need to do a lot more reading. Just send me your articles or whatever to justify whatever you mean and don't be a dick. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) I guess you missed the point that one person has the decision to control everything Again, not true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Sorry mister "trust me bro" I also love to say that you are again, not right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 3 points 3 years ago How did you come to the conclusion that one person has the decision to control everything in China, an arrangement that has never existed anywhere in history, even actual non democratic dictatorships (which China isn't) permalink fedilink source parent [–] RedDawn@hexbear.net 1 point 2 years ago I guess you missed the point that one person has the decision to control everything No, he’s saying you’re wrong (and you are). In China there isn’t one person who controls everything. They have millions of elected officials, you don’t have any clue what you’re talking about. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago* (2 children) I guess you missed the point that one person has the decision to control everything, of course there will be different groups controlling the details, but this is the person who is able to change. Just saying that I should read is pretty much stupid to say, you also just could say nothing, the message would be equal. But i just gonna be you for a moment: If you do not believe this, you need to do a lot more reading. Just send me your articles or whatever to justify whatever you mean and don't be a dick. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) I guess you missed the point that one person has the decision to control everything Again, not true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Sorry mister "trust me bro" I also love to say that you are again, not right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 3 points 3 years ago How did you come to the conclusion that one person has the decision to control everything in China, an arrangement that has never existed anywhere in history, even actual non democratic dictatorships (which China isn't) permalink fedilink source parent [–] RedDawn@hexbear.net 1 point 2 years ago I guess you missed the point that one person has the decision to control everything No, he’s saying you’re wrong (and you are). In China there isn’t one person who controls everything. They have millions of elected officials, you don’t have any clue what you’re talking about. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) I guess you missed the point that one person has the decision to control everything Again, not true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Sorry mister "trust me bro" I also love to say that you are again, not right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 3 points 3 years ago How did you come to the conclusion that one person has the decision to control everything in China, an arrangement that has never existed anywhere in history, even actual non democratic dictatorships (which China isn't) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Sorry mister "trust me bro" I also love to say that you are again, not right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 3 points 3 years ago How did you come to the conclusion that one person has the decision to control everything in China, an arrangement that has never existed anywhere in history, even actual non democratic dictatorships (which China isn't) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 3 points 3 years ago How did you come to the conclusion that one person has the decision to control everything in China, an arrangement that has never existed anywhere in history, even actual non democratic dictatorships (which China isn't) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RedDawn@hexbear.net 1 point 2 years ago I guess you missed the point that one person has the decision to control everything No, he’s saying you’re wrong (and you are). In China there isn’t one person who controls everything. They have millions of elected officials, you don’t have any clue what you’re talking about. permalink fedilink source parent