this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023

71 points (91.8% liked)

Games

games@sh.itjust.works

25,763 readers

2,372 active

2 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 3 years ago

moderators

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

The curious case of Epic Games: how the developer beat Google but not Apple (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 2 years ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works [M] to c/games@sh.itjust.works

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

So Epic had more money for the Google case than the Apple case?

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[+] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

[deleted]

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

Or you might have read that article instead of making wild guesses.

parent

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

And Google isn’t a trillion dollar company?

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago*

$1.67T market cap. To the OP, it took me like 10 sec to look that up.

parent