you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 3 years ago (5 children)
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Thanks for the information but jeez that makes me feel uncomfortable for some reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    It's like the unclosed paren (but correct (craziness).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I've never seen this, but maybe since sentences with a parenthesis in it very rarely get a line break in the middle?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child)

    It is rather common in books, where you often see direct speech spanning multiple paragraphs.

    Edit: sorry, I misinterpeted/misread the comment. I've never seen the double parentheses thing either

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    This hurts my programmer soul, I'll start escaping quotation marks instead

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Being a programmer finally won out over my writing background. For example, I know the rule in the US is to include punctuation inside the quotation marks, but I just can't do it anymore if the punctuation mark is not actually part of the quote. "The British do it right, in my opinion".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    As a native English speaker I feel like I get a say in this. This is the worst rule I've seen proposed. Unbalanced quotation marks are confusing as hell.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments