▲ 105 ▼ Apple will require court order to give push notification data to law enforcement (thehill.com) submitted 2 years ago by WebTheWitted@beehaw.org to c/privacy@lemmy.ml 28 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) So rather that talking in generalities what specific lies have they told about respect for privacy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Took me 5 seconds to find the first lie on their website permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) That’s a claim. You haven’t given any tangible evidence that it’s a lie, you just talk in handywavy generalities permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) This article is a clear evidence. If Apple cared, they'd not send sensitive messages in clear text they can just hand over to pigs Anyways, are you paid to shill for apple? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago No, the article is clear evidence that they are imperfect - not that they don't generally care about user privacy. In general the work they have done on privacy has been pretty good. Apple mandating end-to-end encryption might be something that they sholuld have done - and that's a reasonable criticism, but it looks like it is possible for individual app makers to encrypt their notifications: . There's syill the metadata, of course. If I am being paid to shill for Apple they are being particularly tardy with their payments. But to answer your question, no - I'm a user who is privacy conscious and thinks Apple does a reasonable job. I am, however always interested in knowing about where they are falling down so I can mitigate. General handy wavy accusations don't really help me practically - or indeed anyone. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Took me 5 seconds to find the first lie on their website permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) That’s a claim. You haven’t given any tangible evidence that it’s a lie, you just talk in handywavy generalities permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) This article is a clear evidence. If Apple cared, they'd not send sensitive messages in clear text they can just hand over to pigs Anyways, are you paid to shill for apple? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago No, the article is clear evidence that they are imperfect - not that they don't generally care about user privacy. In general the work they have done on privacy has been pretty good. Apple mandating end-to-end encryption might be something that they sholuld have done - and that's a reasonable criticism, but it looks like it is possible for individual app makers to encrypt their notifications: . There's syill the metadata, of course. If I am being paid to shill for Apple they are being particularly tardy with their payments. But to answer your question, no - I'm a user who is privacy conscious and thinks Apple does a reasonable job. I am, however always interested in knowing about where they are falling down so I can mitigate. General handy wavy accusations don't really help me practically - or indeed anyone. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) That’s a claim. You haven’t given any tangible evidence that it’s a lie, you just talk in handywavy generalities permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) This article is a clear evidence. If Apple cared, they'd not send sensitive messages in clear text they can just hand over to pigs Anyways, are you paid to shill for apple? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago No, the article is clear evidence that they are imperfect - not that they don't generally care about user privacy. In general the work they have done on privacy has been pretty good. Apple mandating end-to-end encryption might be something that they sholuld have done - and that's a reasonable criticism, but it looks like it is possible for individual app makers to encrypt their notifications: . There's syill the metadata, of course. If I am being paid to shill for Apple they are being particularly tardy with their payments. But to answer your question, no - I'm a user who is privacy conscious and thinks Apple does a reasonable job. I am, however always interested in knowing about where they are falling down so I can mitigate. General handy wavy accusations don't really help me practically - or indeed anyone. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) This article is a clear evidence. If Apple cared, they'd not send sensitive messages in clear text they can just hand over to pigs Anyways, are you paid to shill for apple? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago No, the article is clear evidence that they are imperfect - not that they don't generally care about user privacy. In general the work they have done on privacy has been pretty good. Apple mandating end-to-end encryption might be something that they sholuld have done - and that's a reasonable criticism, but it looks like it is possible for individual app makers to encrypt their notifications: . There's syill the metadata, of course. If I am being paid to shill for Apple they are being particularly tardy with their payments. But to answer your question, no - I'm a user who is privacy conscious and thinks Apple does a reasonable job. I am, however always interested in knowing about where they are falling down so I can mitigate. General handy wavy accusations don't really help me practically - or indeed anyone. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago No, the article is clear evidence that they are imperfect - not that they don't generally care about user privacy. In general the work they have done on privacy has been pretty good. Apple mandating end-to-end encryption might be something that they sholuld have done - and that's a reasonable criticism, but it looks like it is possible for individual app makers to encrypt their notifications: . There's syill the metadata, of course. If I am being paid to shill for Apple they are being particularly tardy with their payments. But to answer your question, no - I'm a user who is privacy conscious and thinks Apple does a reasonable job. I am, however always interested in knowing about where they are falling down so I can mitigate. General handy wavy accusations don't really help me practically - or indeed anyone. permalink fedilink source parent