▲ 327 ▼ 'America will become a renter nation': Grant Cardone warns the US could see 100-year mortgages — says we might even rent our clothes (finance.yahoo.com) submitted 2 years ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world 171 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 49 points 2 years ago (2 children) Neofeudalism is the goal of capitalism, always has been. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (5 children) I feel like the purported capitalism that's run rampant for centuries is just an extension and rebranding of the OG feudalism. Always thought that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago Very true, been touting this for years. The rich tricked the peasantry into helping them take over the aristocracy. Now we have less legal protections than a medieval serf. permalink fedilink source parent [–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Basically. The original bourgeois fighting against the feudal lords basically changed just enough so that they themselves could become lords, or lord like, with no so much care for anyone below thier own class. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago You are not alone in believing this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) There are significant differences, but yes, in a way. Class conflict has always been at the core of modern human history, and when the bourgeoisie and Proletariat teamed up against the Aristocracy, Capital was transfered from the hands of the microscopically few to the hands of much more. However, this is an incomplete transfer of power, and as Capital consolidates, it trends back to a form of Feudalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Yeah, well put. I'm just identifying the underlying class conflict of resource scarcity and power hunger, through all of human history under the guise of any and every governmental system Very concisely written dude.. really nails the way the shifting about happened permalink fedilink source parent [–] foggy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I used the term "thinly veiled feudalism" in a college paper or three. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I had a history teacher in the late 90s that lapped up every paper I wrote bc within the boundaries of the assignment, I'd be writing about Che instead of Teddy Roosevelt. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheDeepState@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You will own nothing and be happy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago imo its more like: You will own nothing and be miserable permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (5 children) I feel like the purported capitalism that's run rampant for centuries is just an extension and rebranding of the OG feudalism. Always thought that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago Very true, been touting this for years. The rich tricked the peasantry into helping them take over the aristocracy. Now we have less legal protections than a medieval serf. permalink fedilink source parent [–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Basically. The original bourgeois fighting against the feudal lords basically changed just enough so that they themselves could become lords, or lord like, with no so much care for anyone below thier own class. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago You are not alone in believing this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) There are significant differences, but yes, in a way. Class conflict has always been at the core of modern human history, and when the bourgeoisie and Proletariat teamed up against the Aristocracy, Capital was transfered from the hands of the microscopically few to the hands of much more. However, this is an incomplete transfer of power, and as Capital consolidates, it trends back to a form of Feudalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Yeah, well put. I'm just identifying the underlying class conflict of resource scarcity and power hunger, through all of human history under the guise of any and every governmental system Very concisely written dude.. really nails the way the shifting about happened permalink fedilink source parent [–] foggy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I used the term "thinly veiled feudalism" in a college paper or three. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I had a history teacher in the late 90s that lapped up every paper I wrote bc within the boundaries of the assignment, I'd be writing about Che instead of Teddy Roosevelt. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago Very true, been touting this for years. The rich tricked the peasantry into helping them take over the aristocracy. Now we have less legal protections than a medieval serf. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Basically. The original bourgeois fighting against the feudal lords basically changed just enough so that they themselves could become lords, or lord like, with no so much care for anyone below thier own class. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago You are not alone in believing this. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) There are significant differences, but yes, in a way. Class conflict has always been at the core of modern human history, and when the bourgeoisie and Proletariat teamed up against the Aristocracy, Capital was transfered from the hands of the microscopically few to the hands of much more. However, this is an incomplete transfer of power, and as Capital consolidates, it trends back to a form of Feudalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Yeah, well put. I'm just identifying the underlying class conflict of resource scarcity and power hunger, through all of human history under the guise of any and every governmental system Very concisely written dude.. really nails the way the shifting about happened permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Yeah, well put. I'm just identifying the underlying class conflict of resource scarcity and power hunger, through all of human history under the guise of any and every governmental system Very concisely written dude.. really nails the way the shifting about happened permalink fedilink source parent
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I used the term "thinly veiled feudalism" in a college paper or three. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I had a history teacher in the late 90s that lapped up every paper I wrote bc within the boundaries of the assignment, I'd be writing about Che instead of Teddy Roosevelt. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I had a history teacher in the late 90s that lapped up every paper I wrote bc within the boundaries of the assignment, I'd be writing about Che instead of Teddy Roosevelt. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheDeepState@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You will own nothing and be happy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago imo its more like: You will own nothing and be miserable permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago imo its more like: You will own nothing and be miserable permalink fedilink source parent