▲ 90 ▼ Google’s Android app store monopoly violates antitrust law, jury finds (arstechnica.com) submitted 2 years ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/android@lemdro.id 17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Samsung has one and they aren't allowed to have it as the default. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Nope. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Extra revenue stream To be able to sell their devices in countries not supported by Google Play (China). As a leverage to get better licensing deal from google. Manufacturers must pay Google to include Play Store in their device, and it can cost up to $40 per device. By having their own app store, phone manufacturers might have some leverage in licensing cost negotiation (e.g. Google offering them money to not include other app store). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Samsung has one and they aren't allowed to have it as the default. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Nope. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Nope. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Nope. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Extra revenue stream To be able to sell their devices in countries not supported by Google Play (China). As a leverage to get better licensing deal from google. Manufacturers must pay Google to include Play Store in their device, and it can cost up to $40 per device. By having their own app store, phone manufacturers might have some leverage in licensing cost negotiation (e.g. Google offering them money to not include other app store). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent