▲ 191 ▼ Netflix Gains Six Million Subscribers After Password Sharing Crackdown (www.macrumors.com) submitted 3 years ago by fer0n@lemm.ee to c/moviesandtv@lemmy.film 97 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] DrQuint@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago* (4 children) Uh. Didn't predict this. Yet another example of corporations running the world and nothing to be done about it on an individual level. I'm out of fucks to give. May the world burn.*turns on AC* permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] lntl@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Turn that fuckin AC off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] user1919@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago 37°C here, AC STAYS ON permalink fedilink source parent [+] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] WolfhoundRO@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Have you ever heard the stories of the Dutch and British East India Companies? They're not stories the capitalists will tell you permalink fedilink source parent [–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Guessing the gains are in places the policy isn't in effect. I'd be surprised if they grew in the US. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DrQuint@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago The article says this growth is happening on places where the restrictions were made. So I would say it is up in the US. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yet another example of corporations running the world and nothing to be done about it on an individual level. I mean, there are plenty of things to criticize Netflix for (SAG-AFTRA say hello), but not allowing people who aren't paying for their service to use it for free really isn't a particularly heinous crime in my eyes. It's annoying, because having to pay for things is annoying, but it's not like it's actively immoral permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kichae@kbin.social 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) They're not using it for free, though. If I have a Netflix account with multiple profiles, I'm paying for that. I don't see why I don't get to determine who get to use those profiles. Particularly after Netflix's own marketing department pushed out that "Love is sharing a password" tweet. If they wanted to bump the price of multi-profile accounts, fine, but this accusing your customers of wrongdoing for doing something you yourself promoted is bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 0 points 3 years ago The point is that the terms have changed, and that is no longer what is being offered. By all means, be upset, complain about it, whatever. But to say that a business is morally obligated to continue offering a specific service under specific terms simply because they did so in the past is something I genuinely can't follow. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lntl@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Turn that fuckin AC off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] user1919@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago 37°C here, AC STAYS ON permalink fedilink source parent [+] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WolfhoundRO@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Have you ever heard the stories of the Dutch and British East India Companies? They're not stories the capitalists will tell you permalink fedilink source parent
[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Guessing the gains are in places the policy isn't in effect. I'd be surprised if they grew in the US. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DrQuint@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago The article says this growth is happening on places where the restrictions were made. So I would say it is up in the US. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DrQuint@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago The article says this growth is happening on places where the restrictions were made. So I would say it is up in the US. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yet another example of corporations running the world and nothing to be done about it on an individual level. I mean, there are plenty of things to criticize Netflix for (SAG-AFTRA say hello), but not allowing people who aren't paying for their service to use it for free really isn't a particularly heinous crime in my eyes. It's annoying, because having to pay for things is annoying, but it's not like it's actively immoral permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kichae@kbin.social 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) They're not using it for free, though. If I have a Netflix account with multiple profiles, I'm paying for that. I don't see why I don't get to determine who get to use those profiles. Particularly after Netflix's own marketing department pushed out that "Love is sharing a password" tweet. If they wanted to bump the price of multi-profile accounts, fine, but this accusing your customers of wrongdoing for doing something you yourself promoted is bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 0 points 3 years ago The point is that the terms have changed, and that is no longer what is being offered. By all means, be upset, complain about it, whatever. But to say that a business is morally obligated to continue offering a specific service under specific terms simply because they did so in the past is something I genuinely can't follow. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kichae@kbin.social 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) They're not using it for free, though. If I have a Netflix account with multiple profiles, I'm paying for that. I don't see why I don't get to determine who get to use those profiles. Particularly after Netflix's own marketing department pushed out that "Love is sharing a password" tweet. If they wanted to bump the price of multi-profile accounts, fine, but this accusing your customers of wrongdoing for doing something you yourself promoted is bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 0 points 3 years ago The point is that the terms have changed, and that is no longer what is being offered. By all means, be upset, complain about it, whatever. But to say that a business is morally obligated to continue offering a specific service under specific terms simply because they did so in the past is something I genuinely can't follow. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 0 points 3 years ago The point is that the terms have changed, and that is no longer what is being offered. By all means, be upset, complain about it, whatever. But to say that a business is morally obligated to continue offering a specific service under specific terms simply because they did so in the past is something I genuinely can't follow. permalink fedilink source parent