▲ 789 ▼ soak and jump hump (feddit.de) submitted 2 years ago by sexy_peach@feddit.de to c/memes@lemmy.ml 151 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 48 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Jorgelino@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 years ago (6 children) Mormon - m = Oro permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) Did you mean oron? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) I can’t tell if that is a purposeful typo or not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sus@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago* mormon - 5*n = Oro permalink fedilink source parent [–] _danny@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Technically it'd need to be: mormon / 2m = oron permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) A word isn't a product of letters, that would made mormon = nomorm, but an ordered set, where the subtract operation gives you the first set without any element also found on the second set (in set notation A-B = A-(A intersection B) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] _danny@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago You're right, that would be more technically correct. permalink fedilink source parent [–] themusicman@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* If words are an ordered set, then mormon = morn Words are a base 27 integer. (mormon - mon) / a000 + on = moron permalink fedilink source parent [–] Jorgelino@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago Perhaps... permalink fedilink source parent [–] RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago Mormon - m + e = oreo permalink fedilink source parent [+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] radioactiveradio@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago Oro+a-o= ORA ORA ORA ORA ORA!!!! permalink fedilink source parent [–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) the remainder n needs to be accounted for permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jorgelino@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago The n stands for nothing, therefore it's invisible. permalink fedilink source parent [+] masinko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Math ✔️'s out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Themadbeagle@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago Mormon - m = m (Moron - 1) permalink fedilink source parent [–] xpinchx@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Or... ormon... oron permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jorgelino@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 years ago (6 children) Mormon - m = Oro permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) Did you mean oron? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) I can’t tell if that is a purposeful typo or not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sus@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago* mormon - 5*n = Oro permalink fedilink source parent [–] _danny@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Technically it'd need to be: mormon / 2m = oron permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) A word isn't a product of letters, that would made mormon = nomorm, but an ordered set, where the subtract operation gives you the first set without any element also found on the second set (in set notation A-B = A-(A intersection B) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] _danny@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago You're right, that would be more technically correct. permalink fedilink source parent [–] themusicman@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* If words are an ordered set, then mormon = morn Words are a base 27 integer. (mormon - mon) / a000 + on = moron permalink fedilink source parent [–] Jorgelino@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago Perhaps... permalink fedilink source parent [–] RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago Mormon - m + e = oreo permalink fedilink source parent [+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] radioactiveradio@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago Oro+a-o= ORA ORA ORA ORA ORA!!!! permalink fedilink source parent [–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) the remainder n needs to be accounted for permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jorgelino@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago The n stands for nothing, therefore it's invisible. permalink fedilink source parent [+] masinko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) Did you mean oron? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) I can’t tell if that is a purposeful typo or not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sus@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago* mormon - 5*n = Oro permalink fedilink source parent [–] _danny@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Technically it'd need to be: mormon / 2m = oron permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) A word isn't a product of letters, that would made mormon = nomorm, but an ordered set, where the subtract operation gives you the first set without any element also found on the second set (in set notation A-B = A-(A intersection B) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] _danny@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago You're right, that would be more technically correct. permalink fedilink source parent [–] themusicman@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* If words are an ordered set, then mormon = morn Words are a base 27 integer. (mormon - mon) / a000 + on = moron permalink fedilink source parent [–] Jorgelino@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago Perhaps... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) I can’t tell if that is a purposeful typo or not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sus@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago* mormon - 5*n = Oro permalink fedilink source parent
[–] _danny@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Technically it'd need to be: mormon / 2m = oron permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) A word isn't a product of letters, that would made mormon = nomorm, but an ordered set, where the subtract operation gives you the first set without any element also found on the second set (in set notation A-B = A-(A intersection B) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] _danny@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago You're right, that would be more technically correct. permalink fedilink source parent [–] themusicman@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* If words are an ordered set, then mormon = morn Words are a base 27 integer. (mormon - mon) / a000 + on = moron permalink fedilink source parent
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) A word isn't a product of letters, that would made mormon = nomorm, but an ordered set, where the subtract operation gives you the first set without any element also found on the second set (in set notation A-B = A-(A intersection B) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] _danny@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago You're right, that would be more technically correct. permalink fedilink source parent [–] themusicman@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* If words are an ordered set, then mormon = morn Words are a base 27 integer. (mormon - mon) / a000 + on = moron permalink fedilink source parent
[–] _danny@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago You're right, that would be more technically correct. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] themusicman@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* If words are an ordered set, then mormon = morn Words are a base 27 integer. (mormon - mon) / a000 + on = moron permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago Mormon - m + e = oreo permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] radioactiveradio@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago Oro+a-o= ORA ORA ORA ORA ORA!!!! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) the remainder n needs to be accounted for permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jorgelino@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago The n stands for nothing, therefore it's invisible. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jorgelino@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago The n stands for nothing, therefore it's invisible. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Math ✔️'s out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Themadbeagle@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago Mormon - m = m (Moron - 1) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Themadbeagle@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago Mormon - m = m (Moron - 1) permalink fedilink source parent