▲ 136 ▼ In the USA, can you lose your home even after it is 100% paid off? (lemmy.ml) submitted 2 years ago by Confidant6198@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml 110 comments fedilink hide all child comments Let’s say that you buy a home in cash and have 100% paid off. Could you still lose it somehow?
[+] buzz@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] buzz@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (4 children) ooh I didn't know that! someone without insurance rear-ended my vehicle but I chose not to pursue it because then my own insurance rates would've gone up. But heck I didn't know I could have gotten a house out of it 😄 okay but judging by the state of that guy, I doubt he had a very glamorous living situation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Pappabosley@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (4 children) You could own a room in a crack-house permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Honestly I doubt he had even THAT much going for him ☹️ permalink fedilink source parent [–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago I mean, you could rent that out for a couple grand nowadays. “Market rate” baby. permalink fedilink source parent [–] GreenPlasticSushiGrass@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago That sounds like the premise for a new Tim & Eric series. permalink fedilink source parent [–] And009@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago Side bitch pnp permalink fedilink source parent [–] squiblet@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago If you’re injured, or have a lawyer and doctor say you were, yeah… you don’t literally get their house but they might have to sell it to pay you. More often, their insurance company would pay. permalink fedilink source parent [–] lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago You probably wouldnt have gotten the house. Rather he'd have to sell it to pay the debt. permalink fedilink source parent [–] rekabis@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) someone without insurance rear-ended my vehicle but I chose not to pursue it because then my own insurance rates would've gone up. Somehow, this sounds deeply wrong. Your insurance should cover you regardless of what happens. If it’s an act of god, the insurance company should just swallow those costs. If it’s caused by a third party who is not their customer, they should go after the company that insured the other party, or the other party directly if uninsured. No matter what the circumstances, if you are not at fault you should never see an increase in your rates, no matter how catastrophic the damage or the costs to make it right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Huh ok that's good to know permalink fedilink source parent
[+] buzz@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (4 children) ooh I didn't know that! someone without insurance rear-ended my vehicle but I chose not to pursue it because then my own insurance rates would've gone up. But heck I didn't know I could have gotten a house out of it 😄 okay but judging by the state of that guy, I doubt he had a very glamorous living situation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Pappabosley@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (4 children) You could own a room in a crack-house permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Honestly I doubt he had even THAT much going for him ☹️ permalink fedilink source parent [–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago I mean, you could rent that out for a couple grand nowadays. “Market rate” baby. permalink fedilink source parent [–] GreenPlasticSushiGrass@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago That sounds like the premise for a new Tim & Eric series. permalink fedilink source parent [–] And009@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago Side bitch pnp permalink fedilink source parent [–] squiblet@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago If you’re injured, or have a lawyer and doctor say you were, yeah… you don’t literally get their house but they might have to sell it to pay you. More often, their insurance company would pay. permalink fedilink source parent [–] lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago You probably wouldnt have gotten the house. Rather he'd have to sell it to pay the debt. permalink fedilink source parent [–] rekabis@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) someone without insurance rear-ended my vehicle but I chose not to pursue it because then my own insurance rates would've gone up. Somehow, this sounds deeply wrong. Your insurance should cover you regardless of what happens. If it’s an act of god, the insurance company should just swallow those costs. If it’s caused by a third party who is not their customer, they should go after the company that insured the other party, or the other party directly if uninsured. No matter what the circumstances, if you are not at fault you should never see an increase in your rates, no matter how catastrophic the damage or the costs to make it right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Huh ok that's good to know permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pappabosley@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (4 children) You could own a room in a crack-house permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Honestly I doubt he had even THAT much going for him ☹️ permalink fedilink source parent [–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago I mean, you could rent that out for a couple grand nowadays. “Market rate” baby. permalink fedilink source parent [–] GreenPlasticSushiGrass@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago That sounds like the premise for a new Tim & Eric series. permalink fedilink source parent [–] And009@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago Side bitch pnp permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Honestly I doubt he had even THAT much going for him ☹️ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago I mean, you could rent that out for a couple grand nowadays. “Market rate” baby. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GreenPlasticSushiGrass@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago That sounds like the premise for a new Tim & Eric series. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] squiblet@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago If you’re injured, or have a lawyer and doctor say you were, yeah… you don’t literally get their house but they might have to sell it to pay you. More often, their insurance company would pay. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago You probably wouldnt have gotten the house. Rather he'd have to sell it to pay the debt. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rekabis@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) someone without insurance rear-ended my vehicle but I chose not to pursue it because then my own insurance rates would've gone up. Somehow, this sounds deeply wrong. Your insurance should cover you regardless of what happens. If it’s an act of god, the insurance company should just swallow those costs. If it’s caused by a third party who is not their customer, they should go after the company that insured the other party, or the other party directly if uninsured. No matter what the circumstances, if you are not at fault you should never see an increase in your rates, no matter how catastrophic the damage or the costs to make it right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Huh ok that's good to know permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Huh ok that's good to know permalink fedilink source parent