▲ 571 ▼ Go ahead. (slrpnk.net) submitted 2 years ago by ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to c/memes@slrpnk.net 35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Why should cyclists be the ones who have to go up the slopes? If you're going to do that, raise (or better yet, bury underground) the car lanes instead. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Haywire@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I think they are saying the surface should be raised so the bike lane is level and the street passes over a speed table. This makes it evident that the street is crossing the bike lane, rather than the bike lane crossing the street. We are talking inches, not tens of feet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago That's inconsistent with the "so that bikes don't have to stop at all" part, but it would be much more reasonable than the nonsensical idea I was mocking. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Haywire@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I think they are saying the surface should be raised so the bike lane is level and the street passes over a speed table. This makes it evident that the street is crossing the bike lane, rather than the bike lane crossing the street. We are talking inches, not tens of feet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago That's inconsistent with the "so that bikes don't have to stop at all" part, but it would be much more reasonable than the nonsensical idea I was mocking. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago That's inconsistent with the "so that bikes don't have to stop at all" part, but it would be much more reasonable than the nonsensical idea I was mocking. permalink fedilink source parent