▲ 19 ▼ Daily Discussion Thread: Thu 10 Aug 2023 (aussie.zone) submitted 3 years ago by bot001@aussie.zone [M] to c/melbourne@aussie.zone 202 comments fedilink hide all child comments Welcome to the Melbourne Community Daily Discussion Thread.
[–] Seagoon_@aussie.zone 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) How would she inherit anything? They are divorced. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] CEOofmyhouse56@aussie.zone 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) They are separated. She doesn't want to go halvies in the house. Kill him, kill the in laws. The house is all hers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] heyheyitskay@aussie.zone 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) I'm loving these juicy theories. I don't know that much but I know if the cops are willing to put this out in the public then they're most likely onto something. I was really curious why the food dyhydrator was seized. So what if they find traces of those mushrooms if she claims she "didn't know"? I must be missing something here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CEOofmyhouse56@aussie.zone 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Not sure where the dehydrator comes in only that it was discarded the day after the poisonings. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] heyheyitskay@aussie.zone 2 points 3 years ago* Yeah I feel like unless there's other evidence to suggest she planned to murder them or stand to gain from their deaths it's all circumstantial or manslaughter at best. It's a tricky one because it's very hard to prove what someone knows or doesn't know. I mean this wasn't sleeping pills or rat poison. permalink fedilink source parent [–] baconmash@aussie.zone 3 points 3 years ago if they're all dead her children would inherit everything and she'd get to spend it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CEOofmyhouse56@aussie.zone 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) They are separated. She doesn't want to go halvies in the house. Kill him, kill the in laws. The house is all hers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] heyheyitskay@aussie.zone 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) I'm loving these juicy theories. I don't know that much but I know if the cops are willing to put this out in the public then they're most likely onto something. I was really curious why the food dyhydrator was seized. So what if they find traces of those mushrooms if she claims she "didn't know"? I must be missing something here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CEOofmyhouse56@aussie.zone 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Not sure where the dehydrator comes in only that it was discarded the day after the poisonings. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] heyheyitskay@aussie.zone 2 points 3 years ago* Yeah I feel like unless there's other evidence to suggest she planned to murder them or stand to gain from their deaths it's all circumstantial or manslaughter at best. It's a tricky one because it's very hard to prove what someone knows or doesn't know. I mean this wasn't sleeping pills or rat poison. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] heyheyitskay@aussie.zone 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) I'm loving these juicy theories. I don't know that much but I know if the cops are willing to put this out in the public then they're most likely onto something. I was really curious why the food dyhydrator was seized. So what if they find traces of those mushrooms if she claims she "didn't know"? I must be missing something here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CEOofmyhouse56@aussie.zone 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Not sure where the dehydrator comes in only that it was discarded the day after the poisonings. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] heyheyitskay@aussie.zone 2 points 3 years ago* Yeah I feel like unless there's other evidence to suggest she planned to murder them or stand to gain from their deaths it's all circumstantial or manslaughter at best. It's a tricky one because it's very hard to prove what someone knows or doesn't know. I mean this wasn't sleeping pills or rat poison. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CEOofmyhouse56@aussie.zone 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Not sure where the dehydrator comes in only that it was discarded the day after the poisonings. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] heyheyitskay@aussie.zone 2 points 3 years ago* Yeah I feel like unless there's other evidence to suggest she planned to murder them or stand to gain from their deaths it's all circumstantial or manslaughter at best. It's a tricky one because it's very hard to prove what someone knows or doesn't know. I mean this wasn't sleeping pills or rat poison. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] heyheyitskay@aussie.zone 2 points 3 years ago* Yeah I feel like unless there's other evidence to suggest she planned to murder them or stand to gain from their deaths it's all circumstantial or manslaughter at best. It's a tricky one because it's very hard to prove what someone knows or doesn't know. I mean this wasn't sleeping pills or rat poison. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] baconmash@aussie.zone 3 points 3 years ago if they're all dead her children would inherit everything and she'd get to spend it permalink fedilink source parent