you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Aren't you just seeing the lack of water rather than actually seeing the oxygen?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    And what is inside the bubbles instead of water?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    nitrogen – 78%

    oxygen – 17%

    carbon dioxide – 4%

    other gases - 1%

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Ehhh, if you made a translucent sphere that could hold a vacuum you would get the same outcome l.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    It would be close but but exactly the same. A vacuum would refract the light going through it differently than a bubble of gas. Though I think it would need to be pretty big to see it with the naked eye.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    There won't be that much CO2 for a long time, even if we increase our carbon output. Currently it stands at around 0.04%, third to argon at a bit under 1%. Oxygen is just under 21%. Oxygen and nitrogen together make up over 99% of the atmosphere (at sea level). That's for dry air, otherwise water vapour is at around 1% and the others reduced to fit that in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Well if we're gonna get specific then if your blowing the bubbles I would assume it's largely carbon dioxide lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments