▲ 981 ▼ Yeah where is his photo (midwest.social) submitted 2 years ago by Lanky_Pomegranate530@midwest.social to c/atheistmemes@lemmy.world 124 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago* (2 children) nitrogen – 78% oxygen – 17% carbon dioxide – 4% other gases - 1% permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] corship@feddit.de 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) So you can see 17% oxygen permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] feminalpanda@lemmings.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Ehhh, if you made a translucent sphere that could hold a vacuum you would get the same outcome l. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It would be close but but exactly the same. A vacuum would refract the light going through it differently than a bubble of gas. Though I think it would need to be pretty big to see it with the naked eye. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago You see the a bubble of gas(and therefore the absence of water), not the oxygen itself. You could use only nitrogen gas and you couldn't tell the difference. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) There won't be that much CO2 for a long time, even if we increase our carbon output. Currently it stands at around 0.04%, third to argon at a bit under 1%. Oxygen is just under 21%. Oxygen and nitrogen together make up over 99% of the atmosphere (at sea level). That's for dry air, otherwise water vapour is at around 1% and the others reduced to fit that in. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago Ah, but this is a bubble blown by a person. Exhale would have less oxygen and more CO2. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] corship@feddit.de 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) So you can see 17% oxygen permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] feminalpanda@lemmings.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Ehhh, if you made a translucent sphere that could hold a vacuum you would get the same outcome l. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It would be close but but exactly the same. A vacuum would refract the light going through it differently than a bubble of gas. Though I think it would need to be pretty big to see it with the naked eye. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago You see the a bubble of gas(and therefore the absence of water), not the oxygen itself. You could use only nitrogen gas and you couldn't tell the difference. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] feminalpanda@lemmings.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Ehhh, if you made a translucent sphere that could hold a vacuum you would get the same outcome l. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It would be close but but exactly the same. A vacuum would refract the light going through it differently than a bubble of gas. Though I think it would need to be pretty big to see it with the naked eye. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It would be close but but exactly the same. A vacuum would refract the light going through it differently than a bubble of gas. Though I think it would need to be pretty big to see it with the naked eye. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago You see the a bubble of gas(and therefore the absence of water), not the oxygen itself. You could use only nitrogen gas and you couldn't tell the difference. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) There won't be that much CO2 for a long time, even if we increase our carbon output. Currently it stands at around 0.04%, third to argon at a bit under 1%. Oxygen is just under 21%. Oxygen and nitrogen together make up over 99% of the atmosphere (at sea level). That's for dry air, otherwise water vapour is at around 1% and the others reduced to fit that in. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago Ah, but this is a bubble blown by a person. Exhale would have less oxygen and more CO2. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago Ah, but this is a bubble blown by a person. Exhale would have less oxygen and more CO2. permalink fedilink source parent