you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 56 points 2 years ago (1 child)

As far as I understand from the article, by Chinese law what they're accusing him of is a crime, so technically this is much, much stupider.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yes it’s a very stupid law. “No cooking fried rice on anniversary of death of son of great leader who cooked fried rice in Korean War during bombing run, literally exposing his own position”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If you're seriously questioning this, then the actual terrible laws and acts going on in China would BLOW your mind in... five.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I'm a bit informed about the current situation actually. It's just that the reason behind this law in particular is just... Comical...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Yeah, they imprisoned a Chinese UFC fighter who said he could beat any traditional Chinese martial artist because their kung fu doesn't work in the real world.

    They agreed to set up the match and when he, predictably, beat the living shit out of the spiritual mumbo jumbo guy, over and over again, they claimed he intentionally dishonored China and tried to lock him up.

  • source
  • parent