▲ 272 ▼ liberal values (lemmy.ml) submitted 2 years ago by HonestMistake_@lemmy.ml to c/leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com 158 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] teft@startrek.website 14 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I'm guessing they mean liberal in the classical sense and not liberal in the liberal/conservative meaning of the current US political parties. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) They're talking about the current wars and the current civil rights movements, so that wouldn't make sense anyway. "Whigs sure hate Instagram". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Conservatives are liberals, too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No they aren't permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) I mean conservatism directly spawned from liberalism and is correctly seen as a subgroup of classical liberalism but okay permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) That is shockingly ignorant or deliberately misleading. Can you elaborate as to which one you're going for? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You seem ignorant of what classical liberalism is. Classical liberalism is a political tradition and a branch of liberalism which advocates free market and laissez-faire economics; and civil liberties under the rule of law, with special emphasis on individual autonomy, limited government, economic freedom, political freedom and freedom of speech. And yet you insult those who are correct. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Haha, not even close. Strong move, to jump on the bandwagon a day late and a dollar short, though. I guess it's good you're learning permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wow, I can't think of a less substantiative reply. Why did you bother? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago How did you know what I was going to ask? permalink fedilink source parent [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Since I can’t be bothered I had Chatgpt generate a response Understanding conservatism as a subset of liberalism requires a nuanced view of the historical and philosophical development of these ideologies. Initially, these terms might seem contradictory, but under a broader definition of liberalism, conservatism can be considered a variant or an offshoot. Liberalism, in its broadest historical sense, refers to a range of ideas centered around the importance of individual liberty, the rule of law, and, often, limited government. This broad category emerged during the Enlightenment and was instrumental in shaping the modern Western political and social order. Classical liberalism, in particular, emphasizes individual freedom, economic freedom, and minimal state intervention. Conservatism, while often positioned in opposition to liberalism (especially in its progressive or social liberal forms), can be seen as a subset of liberalism in the context of this broader historical perspective. This view holds when considering that conservatism in Western political thought often shares with liberalism a commitment to certain fundamental principles such as the rule of law, individual rights (although conservatism places a stronger emphasis on communal values and traditions), and, frequently, the free market. However, conservatism diverges from liberalism in its emphasis on tradition, authority, and often a skepticism of rapid social change. Conservative liberalism, or liberal conservatism, is a term used to describe ideologies that blend liberal values (like economic freedom) with conservative stances (such as an emphasis on traditional social structures). In summary, while conservatism and liberalism are distinct in their traditional definitions and core philosophies, conservatism can be viewed as a subset of liberalism in the context of a broader, historical understanding of liberalism. This perspective sees both ideologies sharing some fundamental values but differing significantly in their approach to tradition, social change, and the balance between individual rights and communal responsibilities. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you don't even understand your own arguments, try not making them. That AI explanation is even more narrow than the other incorrect narratives you've tried to put forth. It's basically saying that if you look at blue as a color and acknowledge that red is a color, then blue is technically a subset of red. Which it is not permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I could explain. I just don’t see you as being worth the bother. Your uninformed followup that features exactly no useful rejoinders or any conception of political philosophy confirms I made the correct decision to treat you like a stooge. I have engaged in no narratives, simply a correct understanding of the history and philosophy of the liberal movement. I highly doubt you know enough about liberalism to even say what the philosophy cares about at its core. I wish it surprised me that liberals don’t even know what liberalism is, but I’ve been involved in political debates for far too long. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) More vague accusations with no evidence or theses behind them. You are single-mindedly focused on exposing your own ignorance. By all means, take another swing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) oh dear god try not to hurt yourself thinking literally none of this is controversial to anyone with any sort of understanding of political philosophy. but go off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) As long as you can't put forth a coherent thesis or even a clear opinion, you aren't going to gain any ground. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Your rejoinder to the coherent thesis was "nuh uh" and "robot bad" so i think I'm just gonna point and laugh now, you dumb fuck. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sounds about your speed: vague, easily diaprovsble claims, make up arguments for others because you can't defend your own incorrect opinions or counter theirs, and then retreat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Okay then disprove them? Jesus the amount of projection going on could power a small continent if properly captured. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Which one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Self-hating bot? That's a new one. Lmao I just saw that you referenced the Whigs as liberals. You literally proved my point before this even started. Google Edmund Burke you absolute shit-stain. Blocked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago "A new one" that you made up instead of accurately addressing my points. And then you pretended I wrote something I didn't. Scurry away. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) They're talking about the current wars and the current civil rights movements, so that wouldn't make sense anyway. "Whigs sure hate Instagram". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Conservatives are liberals, too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No they aren't permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) I mean conservatism directly spawned from liberalism and is correctly seen as a subgroup of classical liberalism but okay permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) That is shockingly ignorant or deliberately misleading. Can you elaborate as to which one you're going for? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You seem ignorant of what classical liberalism is. Classical liberalism is a political tradition and a branch of liberalism which advocates free market and laissez-faire economics; and civil liberties under the rule of law, with special emphasis on individual autonomy, limited government, economic freedom, political freedom and freedom of speech. And yet you insult those who are correct. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Haha, not even close. Strong move, to jump on the bandwagon a day late and a dollar short, though. I guess it's good you're learning permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wow, I can't think of a less substantiative reply. Why did you bother? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago How did you know what I was going to ask? permalink fedilink source parent [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Since I can’t be bothered I had Chatgpt generate a response Understanding conservatism as a subset of liberalism requires a nuanced view of the historical and philosophical development of these ideologies. Initially, these terms might seem contradictory, but under a broader definition of liberalism, conservatism can be considered a variant or an offshoot. Liberalism, in its broadest historical sense, refers to a range of ideas centered around the importance of individual liberty, the rule of law, and, often, limited government. This broad category emerged during the Enlightenment and was instrumental in shaping the modern Western political and social order. Classical liberalism, in particular, emphasizes individual freedom, economic freedom, and minimal state intervention. Conservatism, while often positioned in opposition to liberalism (especially in its progressive or social liberal forms), can be seen as a subset of liberalism in the context of this broader historical perspective. This view holds when considering that conservatism in Western political thought often shares with liberalism a commitment to certain fundamental principles such as the rule of law, individual rights (although conservatism places a stronger emphasis on communal values and traditions), and, frequently, the free market. However, conservatism diverges from liberalism in its emphasis on tradition, authority, and often a skepticism of rapid social change. Conservative liberalism, or liberal conservatism, is a term used to describe ideologies that blend liberal values (like economic freedom) with conservative stances (such as an emphasis on traditional social structures). In summary, while conservatism and liberalism are distinct in their traditional definitions and core philosophies, conservatism can be viewed as a subset of liberalism in the context of a broader, historical understanding of liberalism. This perspective sees both ideologies sharing some fundamental values but differing significantly in their approach to tradition, social change, and the balance between individual rights and communal responsibilities. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you don't even understand your own arguments, try not making them. That AI explanation is even more narrow than the other incorrect narratives you've tried to put forth. It's basically saying that if you look at blue as a color and acknowledge that red is a color, then blue is technically a subset of red. Which it is not permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I could explain. I just don’t see you as being worth the bother. Your uninformed followup that features exactly no useful rejoinders or any conception of political philosophy confirms I made the correct decision to treat you like a stooge. I have engaged in no narratives, simply a correct understanding of the history and philosophy of the liberal movement. I highly doubt you know enough about liberalism to even say what the philosophy cares about at its core. I wish it surprised me that liberals don’t even know what liberalism is, but I’ve been involved in political debates for far too long. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) More vague accusations with no evidence or theses behind them. You are single-mindedly focused on exposing your own ignorance. By all means, take another swing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) oh dear god try not to hurt yourself thinking literally none of this is controversial to anyone with any sort of understanding of political philosophy. but go off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) As long as you can't put forth a coherent thesis or even a clear opinion, you aren't going to gain any ground. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Your rejoinder to the coherent thesis was "nuh uh" and "robot bad" so i think I'm just gonna point and laugh now, you dumb fuck. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sounds about your speed: vague, easily diaprovsble claims, make up arguments for others because you can't defend your own incorrect opinions or counter theirs, and then retreat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Okay then disprove them? Jesus the amount of projection going on could power a small continent if properly captured. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Which one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Self-hating bot? That's a new one. Lmao I just saw that you referenced the Whigs as liberals. You literally proved my point before this even started. Google Edmund Burke you absolute shit-stain. Blocked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago "A new one" that you made up instead of accurately addressing my points. And then you pretended I wrote something I didn't. Scurry away. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Conservatives are liberals, too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No they aren't permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) I mean conservatism directly spawned from liberalism and is correctly seen as a subgroup of classical liberalism but okay permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) That is shockingly ignorant or deliberately misleading. Can you elaborate as to which one you're going for? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You seem ignorant of what classical liberalism is. Classical liberalism is a political tradition and a branch of liberalism which advocates free market and laissez-faire economics; and civil liberties under the rule of law, with special emphasis on individual autonomy, limited government, economic freedom, political freedom and freedom of speech. And yet you insult those who are correct. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Haha, not even close. Strong move, to jump on the bandwagon a day late and a dollar short, though. I guess it's good you're learning permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wow, I can't think of a less substantiative reply. Why did you bother? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago How did you know what I was going to ask? permalink fedilink source parent [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Since I can’t be bothered I had Chatgpt generate a response Understanding conservatism as a subset of liberalism requires a nuanced view of the historical and philosophical development of these ideologies. Initially, these terms might seem contradictory, but under a broader definition of liberalism, conservatism can be considered a variant or an offshoot. Liberalism, in its broadest historical sense, refers to a range of ideas centered around the importance of individual liberty, the rule of law, and, often, limited government. This broad category emerged during the Enlightenment and was instrumental in shaping the modern Western political and social order. Classical liberalism, in particular, emphasizes individual freedom, economic freedom, and minimal state intervention. Conservatism, while often positioned in opposition to liberalism (especially in its progressive or social liberal forms), can be seen as a subset of liberalism in the context of this broader historical perspective. This view holds when considering that conservatism in Western political thought often shares with liberalism a commitment to certain fundamental principles such as the rule of law, individual rights (although conservatism places a stronger emphasis on communal values and traditions), and, frequently, the free market. However, conservatism diverges from liberalism in its emphasis on tradition, authority, and often a skepticism of rapid social change. Conservative liberalism, or liberal conservatism, is a term used to describe ideologies that blend liberal values (like economic freedom) with conservative stances (such as an emphasis on traditional social structures). In summary, while conservatism and liberalism are distinct in their traditional definitions and core philosophies, conservatism can be viewed as a subset of liberalism in the context of a broader, historical understanding of liberalism. This perspective sees both ideologies sharing some fundamental values but differing significantly in their approach to tradition, social change, and the balance between individual rights and communal responsibilities. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you don't even understand your own arguments, try not making them. That AI explanation is even more narrow than the other incorrect narratives you've tried to put forth. It's basically saying that if you look at blue as a color and acknowledge that red is a color, then blue is technically a subset of red. Which it is not permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I could explain. I just don’t see you as being worth the bother. Your uninformed followup that features exactly no useful rejoinders or any conception of political philosophy confirms I made the correct decision to treat you like a stooge. I have engaged in no narratives, simply a correct understanding of the history and philosophy of the liberal movement. I highly doubt you know enough about liberalism to even say what the philosophy cares about at its core. I wish it surprised me that liberals don’t even know what liberalism is, but I’ve been involved in political debates for far too long. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) More vague accusations with no evidence or theses behind them. You are single-mindedly focused on exposing your own ignorance. By all means, take another swing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) oh dear god try not to hurt yourself thinking literally none of this is controversial to anyone with any sort of understanding of political philosophy. but go off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) As long as you can't put forth a coherent thesis or even a clear opinion, you aren't going to gain any ground. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Your rejoinder to the coherent thesis was "nuh uh" and "robot bad" so i think I'm just gonna point and laugh now, you dumb fuck. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sounds about your speed: vague, easily diaprovsble claims, make up arguments for others because you can't defend your own incorrect opinions or counter theirs, and then retreat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Okay then disprove them? Jesus the amount of projection going on could power a small continent if properly captured. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Which one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Self-hating bot? That's a new one. Lmao I just saw that you referenced the Whigs as liberals. You literally proved my point before this even started. Google Edmund Burke you absolute shit-stain. Blocked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago "A new one" that you made up instead of accurately addressing my points. And then you pretended I wrote something I didn't. Scurry away. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No they aren't permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) I mean conservatism directly spawned from liberalism and is correctly seen as a subgroup of classical liberalism but okay permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) That is shockingly ignorant or deliberately misleading. Can you elaborate as to which one you're going for? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You seem ignorant of what classical liberalism is. Classical liberalism is a political tradition and a branch of liberalism which advocates free market and laissez-faire economics; and civil liberties under the rule of law, with special emphasis on individual autonomy, limited government, economic freedom, political freedom and freedom of speech. And yet you insult those who are correct. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Haha, not even close. Strong move, to jump on the bandwagon a day late and a dollar short, though. I guess it's good you're learning permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wow, I can't think of a less substantiative reply. Why did you bother? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago How did you know what I was going to ask? permalink fedilink source parent [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Since I can’t be bothered I had Chatgpt generate a response Understanding conservatism as a subset of liberalism requires a nuanced view of the historical and philosophical development of these ideologies. Initially, these terms might seem contradictory, but under a broader definition of liberalism, conservatism can be considered a variant or an offshoot. Liberalism, in its broadest historical sense, refers to a range of ideas centered around the importance of individual liberty, the rule of law, and, often, limited government. This broad category emerged during the Enlightenment and was instrumental in shaping the modern Western political and social order. Classical liberalism, in particular, emphasizes individual freedom, economic freedom, and minimal state intervention. Conservatism, while often positioned in opposition to liberalism (especially in its progressive or social liberal forms), can be seen as a subset of liberalism in the context of this broader historical perspective. This view holds when considering that conservatism in Western political thought often shares with liberalism a commitment to certain fundamental principles such as the rule of law, individual rights (although conservatism places a stronger emphasis on communal values and traditions), and, frequently, the free market. However, conservatism diverges from liberalism in its emphasis on tradition, authority, and often a skepticism of rapid social change. Conservative liberalism, or liberal conservatism, is a term used to describe ideologies that blend liberal values (like economic freedom) with conservative stances (such as an emphasis on traditional social structures). In summary, while conservatism and liberalism are distinct in their traditional definitions and core philosophies, conservatism can be viewed as a subset of liberalism in the context of a broader, historical understanding of liberalism. This perspective sees both ideologies sharing some fundamental values but differing significantly in their approach to tradition, social change, and the balance between individual rights and communal responsibilities. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you don't even understand your own arguments, try not making them. That AI explanation is even more narrow than the other incorrect narratives you've tried to put forth. It's basically saying that if you look at blue as a color and acknowledge that red is a color, then blue is technically a subset of red. Which it is not permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I could explain. I just don’t see you as being worth the bother. Your uninformed followup that features exactly no useful rejoinders or any conception of political philosophy confirms I made the correct decision to treat you like a stooge. I have engaged in no narratives, simply a correct understanding of the history and philosophy of the liberal movement. I highly doubt you know enough about liberalism to even say what the philosophy cares about at its core. I wish it surprised me that liberals don’t even know what liberalism is, but I’ve been involved in political debates for far too long. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) More vague accusations with no evidence or theses behind them. You are single-mindedly focused on exposing your own ignorance. By all means, take another swing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) oh dear god try not to hurt yourself thinking literally none of this is controversial to anyone with any sort of understanding of political philosophy. but go off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) As long as you can't put forth a coherent thesis or even a clear opinion, you aren't going to gain any ground. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Your rejoinder to the coherent thesis was "nuh uh" and "robot bad" so i think I'm just gonna point and laugh now, you dumb fuck. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sounds about your speed: vague, easily diaprovsble claims, make up arguments for others because you can't defend your own incorrect opinions or counter theirs, and then retreat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Okay then disprove them? Jesus the amount of projection going on could power a small continent if properly captured. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Which one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Self-hating bot? That's a new one. Lmao I just saw that you referenced the Whigs as liberals. You literally proved my point before this even started. Google Edmund Burke you absolute shit-stain. Blocked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago "A new one" that you made up instead of accurately addressing my points. And then you pretended I wrote something I didn't. Scurry away. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) I mean conservatism directly spawned from liberalism and is correctly seen as a subgroup of classical liberalism but okay permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) That is shockingly ignorant or deliberately misleading. Can you elaborate as to which one you're going for? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You seem ignorant of what classical liberalism is. Classical liberalism is a political tradition and a branch of liberalism which advocates free market and laissez-faire economics; and civil liberties under the rule of law, with special emphasis on individual autonomy, limited government, economic freedom, political freedom and freedom of speech. And yet you insult those who are correct. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Haha, not even close. Strong move, to jump on the bandwagon a day late and a dollar short, though. I guess it's good you're learning permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wow, I can't think of a less substantiative reply. Why did you bother? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago How did you know what I was going to ask? permalink fedilink source parent [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Since I can’t be bothered I had Chatgpt generate a response Understanding conservatism as a subset of liberalism requires a nuanced view of the historical and philosophical development of these ideologies. Initially, these terms might seem contradictory, but under a broader definition of liberalism, conservatism can be considered a variant or an offshoot. Liberalism, in its broadest historical sense, refers to a range of ideas centered around the importance of individual liberty, the rule of law, and, often, limited government. This broad category emerged during the Enlightenment and was instrumental in shaping the modern Western political and social order. Classical liberalism, in particular, emphasizes individual freedom, economic freedom, and minimal state intervention. Conservatism, while often positioned in opposition to liberalism (especially in its progressive or social liberal forms), can be seen as a subset of liberalism in the context of this broader historical perspective. This view holds when considering that conservatism in Western political thought often shares with liberalism a commitment to certain fundamental principles such as the rule of law, individual rights (although conservatism places a stronger emphasis on communal values and traditions), and, frequently, the free market. However, conservatism diverges from liberalism in its emphasis on tradition, authority, and often a skepticism of rapid social change. Conservative liberalism, or liberal conservatism, is a term used to describe ideologies that blend liberal values (like economic freedom) with conservative stances (such as an emphasis on traditional social structures). In summary, while conservatism and liberalism are distinct in their traditional definitions and core philosophies, conservatism can be viewed as a subset of liberalism in the context of a broader, historical understanding of liberalism. This perspective sees both ideologies sharing some fundamental values but differing significantly in their approach to tradition, social change, and the balance between individual rights and communal responsibilities. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you don't even understand your own arguments, try not making them. That AI explanation is even more narrow than the other incorrect narratives you've tried to put forth. It's basically saying that if you look at blue as a color and acknowledge that red is a color, then blue is technically a subset of red. Which it is not permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I could explain. I just don’t see you as being worth the bother. Your uninformed followup that features exactly no useful rejoinders or any conception of political philosophy confirms I made the correct decision to treat you like a stooge. I have engaged in no narratives, simply a correct understanding of the history and philosophy of the liberal movement. I highly doubt you know enough about liberalism to even say what the philosophy cares about at its core. I wish it surprised me that liberals don’t even know what liberalism is, but I’ve been involved in political debates for far too long. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) More vague accusations with no evidence or theses behind them. You are single-mindedly focused on exposing your own ignorance. By all means, take another swing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) oh dear god try not to hurt yourself thinking literally none of this is controversial to anyone with any sort of understanding of political philosophy. but go off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) As long as you can't put forth a coherent thesis or even a clear opinion, you aren't going to gain any ground. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Your rejoinder to the coherent thesis was "nuh uh" and "robot bad" so i think I'm just gonna point and laugh now, you dumb fuck. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sounds about your speed: vague, easily diaprovsble claims, make up arguments for others because you can't defend your own incorrect opinions or counter theirs, and then retreat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Okay then disprove them? Jesus the amount of projection going on could power a small continent if properly captured. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Which one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Self-hating bot? That's a new one. Lmao I just saw that you referenced the Whigs as liberals. You literally proved my point before this even started. Google Edmund Burke you absolute shit-stain. Blocked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago "A new one" that you made up instead of accurately addressing my points. And then you pretended I wrote something I didn't. Scurry away. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) That is shockingly ignorant or deliberately misleading. Can you elaborate as to which one you're going for? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You seem ignorant of what classical liberalism is. Classical liberalism is a political tradition and a branch of liberalism which advocates free market and laissez-faire economics; and civil liberties under the rule of law, with special emphasis on individual autonomy, limited government, economic freedom, political freedom and freedom of speech. And yet you insult those who are correct. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Haha, not even close. Strong move, to jump on the bandwagon a day late and a dollar short, though. I guess it's good you're learning permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wow, I can't think of a less substantiative reply. Why did you bother? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago How did you know what I was going to ask? permalink fedilink source parent [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Since I can’t be bothered I had Chatgpt generate a response Understanding conservatism as a subset of liberalism requires a nuanced view of the historical and philosophical development of these ideologies. Initially, these terms might seem contradictory, but under a broader definition of liberalism, conservatism can be considered a variant or an offshoot. Liberalism, in its broadest historical sense, refers to a range of ideas centered around the importance of individual liberty, the rule of law, and, often, limited government. This broad category emerged during the Enlightenment and was instrumental in shaping the modern Western political and social order. Classical liberalism, in particular, emphasizes individual freedom, economic freedom, and minimal state intervention. Conservatism, while often positioned in opposition to liberalism (especially in its progressive or social liberal forms), can be seen as a subset of liberalism in the context of this broader historical perspective. This view holds when considering that conservatism in Western political thought often shares with liberalism a commitment to certain fundamental principles such as the rule of law, individual rights (although conservatism places a stronger emphasis on communal values and traditions), and, frequently, the free market. However, conservatism diverges from liberalism in its emphasis on tradition, authority, and often a skepticism of rapid social change. Conservative liberalism, or liberal conservatism, is a term used to describe ideologies that blend liberal values (like economic freedom) with conservative stances (such as an emphasis on traditional social structures). In summary, while conservatism and liberalism are distinct in their traditional definitions and core philosophies, conservatism can be viewed as a subset of liberalism in the context of a broader, historical understanding of liberalism. This perspective sees both ideologies sharing some fundamental values but differing significantly in their approach to tradition, social change, and the balance between individual rights and communal responsibilities. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you don't even understand your own arguments, try not making them. That AI explanation is even more narrow than the other incorrect narratives you've tried to put forth. It's basically saying that if you look at blue as a color and acknowledge that red is a color, then blue is technically a subset of red. Which it is not permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I could explain. I just don’t see you as being worth the bother. Your uninformed followup that features exactly no useful rejoinders or any conception of political philosophy confirms I made the correct decision to treat you like a stooge. I have engaged in no narratives, simply a correct understanding of the history and philosophy of the liberal movement. I highly doubt you know enough about liberalism to even say what the philosophy cares about at its core. I wish it surprised me that liberals don’t even know what liberalism is, but I’ve been involved in political debates for far too long. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) More vague accusations with no evidence or theses behind them. You are single-mindedly focused on exposing your own ignorance. By all means, take another swing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) oh dear god try not to hurt yourself thinking literally none of this is controversial to anyone with any sort of understanding of political philosophy. but go off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) As long as you can't put forth a coherent thesis or even a clear opinion, you aren't going to gain any ground. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Your rejoinder to the coherent thesis was "nuh uh" and "robot bad" so i think I'm just gonna point and laugh now, you dumb fuck. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sounds about your speed: vague, easily diaprovsble claims, make up arguments for others because you can't defend your own incorrect opinions or counter theirs, and then retreat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Okay then disprove them? Jesus the amount of projection going on could power a small continent if properly captured. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Which one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Self-hating bot? That's a new one. Lmao I just saw that you referenced the Whigs as liberals. You literally proved my point before this even started. Google Edmund Burke you absolute shit-stain. Blocked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago "A new one" that you made up instead of accurately addressing my points. And then you pretended I wrote something I didn't. Scurry away. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You seem ignorant of what classical liberalism is. Classical liberalism is a political tradition and a branch of liberalism which advocates free market and laissez-faire economics; and civil liberties under the rule of law, with special emphasis on individual autonomy, limited government, economic freedom, political freedom and freedom of speech. And yet you insult those who are correct. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Haha, not even close. Strong move, to jump on the bandwagon a day late and a dollar short, though. I guess it's good you're learning permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wow, I can't think of a less substantiative reply. Why did you bother? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago How did you know what I was going to ask? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Haha, not even close. Strong move, to jump on the bandwagon a day late and a dollar short, though. I guess it's good you're learning permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wow, I can't think of a less substantiative reply. Why did you bother? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago How did you know what I was going to ask? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wow, I can't think of a less substantiative reply. Why did you bother? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago How did you know what I was going to ask? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago How did you know what I was going to ask? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Since I can’t be bothered I had Chatgpt generate a response Understanding conservatism as a subset of liberalism requires a nuanced view of the historical and philosophical development of these ideologies. Initially, these terms might seem contradictory, but under a broader definition of liberalism, conservatism can be considered a variant or an offshoot. Liberalism, in its broadest historical sense, refers to a range of ideas centered around the importance of individual liberty, the rule of law, and, often, limited government. This broad category emerged during the Enlightenment and was instrumental in shaping the modern Western political and social order. Classical liberalism, in particular, emphasizes individual freedom, economic freedom, and minimal state intervention. Conservatism, while often positioned in opposition to liberalism (especially in its progressive or social liberal forms), can be seen as a subset of liberalism in the context of this broader historical perspective. This view holds when considering that conservatism in Western political thought often shares with liberalism a commitment to certain fundamental principles such as the rule of law, individual rights (although conservatism places a stronger emphasis on communal values and traditions), and, frequently, the free market. However, conservatism diverges from liberalism in its emphasis on tradition, authority, and often a skepticism of rapid social change. Conservative liberalism, or liberal conservatism, is a term used to describe ideologies that blend liberal values (like economic freedom) with conservative stances (such as an emphasis on traditional social structures). In summary, while conservatism and liberalism are distinct in their traditional definitions and core philosophies, conservatism can be viewed as a subset of liberalism in the context of a broader, historical understanding of liberalism. This perspective sees both ideologies sharing some fundamental values but differing significantly in their approach to tradition, social change, and the balance between individual rights and communal responsibilities. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you don't even understand your own arguments, try not making them. That AI explanation is even more narrow than the other incorrect narratives you've tried to put forth. It's basically saying that if you look at blue as a color and acknowledge that red is a color, then blue is technically a subset of red. Which it is not permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I could explain. I just don’t see you as being worth the bother. Your uninformed followup that features exactly no useful rejoinders or any conception of political philosophy confirms I made the correct decision to treat you like a stooge. I have engaged in no narratives, simply a correct understanding of the history and philosophy of the liberal movement. I highly doubt you know enough about liberalism to even say what the philosophy cares about at its core. I wish it surprised me that liberals don’t even know what liberalism is, but I’ve been involved in political debates for far too long. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) More vague accusations with no evidence or theses behind them. You are single-mindedly focused on exposing your own ignorance. By all means, take another swing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) oh dear god try not to hurt yourself thinking literally none of this is controversial to anyone with any sort of understanding of political philosophy. but go off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) As long as you can't put forth a coherent thesis or even a clear opinion, you aren't going to gain any ground. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Your rejoinder to the coherent thesis was "nuh uh" and "robot bad" so i think I'm just gonna point and laugh now, you dumb fuck. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sounds about your speed: vague, easily diaprovsble claims, make up arguments for others because you can't defend your own incorrect opinions or counter theirs, and then retreat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Okay then disprove them? Jesus the amount of projection going on could power a small continent if properly captured. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Which one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Self-hating bot? That's a new one. Lmao I just saw that you referenced the Whigs as liberals. You literally proved my point before this even started. Google Edmund Burke you absolute shit-stain. Blocked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago "A new one" that you made up instead of accurately addressing my points. And then you pretended I wrote something I didn't. Scurry away. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you don't even understand your own arguments, try not making them. That AI explanation is even more narrow than the other incorrect narratives you've tried to put forth. It's basically saying that if you look at blue as a color and acknowledge that red is a color, then blue is technically a subset of red. Which it is not permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I could explain. I just don’t see you as being worth the bother. Your uninformed followup that features exactly no useful rejoinders or any conception of political philosophy confirms I made the correct decision to treat you like a stooge. I have engaged in no narratives, simply a correct understanding of the history and philosophy of the liberal movement. I highly doubt you know enough about liberalism to even say what the philosophy cares about at its core. I wish it surprised me that liberals don’t even know what liberalism is, but I’ve been involved in political debates for far too long. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) More vague accusations with no evidence or theses behind them. You are single-mindedly focused on exposing your own ignorance. By all means, take another swing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) oh dear god try not to hurt yourself thinking literally none of this is controversial to anyone with any sort of understanding of political philosophy. but go off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) As long as you can't put forth a coherent thesis or even a clear opinion, you aren't going to gain any ground. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Your rejoinder to the coherent thesis was "nuh uh" and "robot bad" so i think I'm just gonna point and laugh now, you dumb fuck. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sounds about your speed: vague, easily diaprovsble claims, make up arguments for others because you can't defend your own incorrect opinions or counter theirs, and then retreat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Okay then disprove them? Jesus the amount of projection going on could power a small continent if properly captured. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Which one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Self-hating bot? That's a new one. Lmao I just saw that you referenced the Whigs as liberals. You literally proved my point before this even started. Google Edmund Burke you absolute shit-stain. Blocked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago "A new one" that you made up instead of accurately addressing my points. And then you pretended I wrote something I didn't. Scurry away. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I could explain. I just don’t see you as being worth the bother. Your uninformed followup that features exactly no useful rejoinders or any conception of political philosophy confirms I made the correct decision to treat you like a stooge. I have engaged in no narratives, simply a correct understanding of the history and philosophy of the liberal movement. I highly doubt you know enough about liberalism to even say what the philosophy cares about at its core. I wish it surprised me that liberals don’t even know what liberalism is, but I’ve been involved in political debates for far too long. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) More vague accusations with no evidence or theses behind them. You are single-mindedly focused on exposing your own ignorance. By all means, take another swing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) oh dear god try not to hurt yourself thinking literally none of this is controversial to anyone with any sort of understanding of political philosophy. but go off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) As long as you can't put forth a coherent thesis or even a clear opinion, you aren't going to gain any ground. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Your rejoinder to the coherent thesis was "nuh uh" and "robot bad" so i think I'm just gonna point and laugh now, you dumb fuck. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sounds about your speed: vague, easily diaprovsble claims, make up arguments for others because you can't defend your own incorrect opinions or counter theirs, and then retreat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Okay then disprove them? Jesus the amount of projection going on could power a small continent if properly captured. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Which one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Self-hating bot? That's a new one. Lmao I just saw that you referenced the Whigs as liberals. You literally proved my point before this even started. Google Edmund Burke you absolute shit-stain. Blocked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago "A new one" that you made up instead of accurately addressing my points. And then you pretended I wrote something I didn't. Scurry away. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) More vague accusations with no evidence or theses behind them. You are single-mindedly focused on exposing your own ignorance. By all means, take another swing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) oh dear god try not to hurt yourself thinking literally none of this is controversial to anyone with any sort of understanding of political philosophy. but go off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) As long as you can't put forth a coherent thesis or even a clear opinion, you aren't going to gain any ground. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Your rejoinder to the coherent thesis was "nuh uh" and "robot bad" so i think I'm just gonna point and laugh now, you dumb fuck. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sounds about your speed: vague, easily diaprovsble claims, make up arguments for others because you can't defend your own incorrect opinions or counter theirs, and then retreat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Okay then disprove them? Jesus the amount of projection going on could power a small continent if properly captured. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Which one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Self-hating bot? That's a new one. Lmao I just saw that you referenced the Whigs as liberals. You literally proved my point before this even started. Google Edmund Burke you absolute shit-stain. Blocked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago "A new one" that you made up instead of accurately addressing my points. And then you pretended I wrote something I didn't. Scurry away. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) oh dear god try not to hurt yourself thinking literally none of this is controversial to anyone with any sort of understanding of political philosophy. but go off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) As long as you can't put forth a coherent thesis or even a clear opinion, you aren't going to gain any ground. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Your rejoinder to the coherent thesis was "nuh uh" and "robot bad" so i think I'm just gonna point and laugh now, you dumb fuck. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sounds about your speed: vague, easily diaprovsble claims, make up arguments for others because you can't defend your own incorrect opinions or counter theirs, and then retreat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Okay then disprove them? Jesus the amount of projection going on could power a small continent if properly captured. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Which one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Self-hating bot? That's a new one. Lmao I just saw that you referenced the Whigs as liberals. You literally proved my point before this even started. Google Edmund Burke you absolute shit-stain. Blocked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago "A new one" that you made up instead of accurately addressing my points. And then you pretended I wrote something I didn't. Scurry away. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) As long as you can't put forth a coherent thesis or even a clear opinion, you aren't going to gain any ground. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Your rejoinder to the coherent thesis was "nuh uh" and "robot bad" so i think I'm just gonna point and laugh now, you dumb fuck. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sounds about your speed: vague, easily diaprovsble claims, make up arguments for others because you can't defend your own incorrect opinions or counter theirs, and then retreat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Okay then disprove them? Jesus the amount of projection going on could power a small continent if properly captured. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Which one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Self-hating bot? That's a new one. Lmao I just saw that you referenced the Whigs as liberals. You literally proved my point before this even started. Google Edmund Burke you absolute shit-stain. Blocked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago "A new one" that you made up instead of accurately addressing my points. And then you pretended I wrote something I didn't. Scurry away. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Your rejoinder to the coherent thesis was "nuh uh" and "robot bad" so i think I'm just gonna point and laugh now, you dumb fuck. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sounds about your speed: vague, easily diaprovsble claims, make up arguments for others because you can't defend your own incorrect opinions or counter theirs, and then retreat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Okay then disprove them? Jesus the amount of projection going on could power a small continent if properly captured. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Which one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Self-hating bot? That's a new one. Lmao I just saw that you referenced the Whigs as liberals. You literally proved my point before this even started. Google Edmund Burke you absolute shit-stain. Blocked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago "A new one" that you made up instead of accurately addressing my points. And then you pretended I wrote something I didn't. Scurry away. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sounds about your speed: vague, easily diaprovsble claims, make up arguments for others because you can't defend your own incorrect opinions or counter theirs, and then retreat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Okay then disprove them? Jesus the amount of projection going on could power a small continent if properly captured. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Which one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Self-hating bot? That's a new one. Lmao I just saw that you referenced the Whigs as liberals. You literally proved my point before this even started. Google Edmund Burke you absolute shit-stain. Blocked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago "A new one" that you made up instead of accurately addressing my points. And then you pretended I wrote something I didn't. Scurry away. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Okay then disprove them? Jesus the amount of projection going on could power a small continent if properly captured. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Which one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Self-hating bot? That's a new one. Lmao I just saw that you referenced the Whigs as liberals. You literally proved my point before this even started. Google Edmund Burke you absolute shit-stain. Blocked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago "A new one" that you made up instead of accurately addressing my points. And then you pretended I wrote something I didn't. Scurry away. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Which one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Self-hating bot? That's a new one. Lmao I just saw that you referenced the Whigs as liberals. You literally proved my point before this even started. Google Edmund Burke you absolute shit-stain. Blocked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago "A new one" that you made up instead of accurately addressing my points. And then you pretended I wrote something I didn't. Scurry away. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Self-hating bot? That's a new one. Lmao I just saw that you referenced the Whigs as liberals. You literally proved my point before this even started. Google Edmund Burke you absolute shit-stain. Blocked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago "A new one" that you made up instead of accurately addressing my points. And then you pretended I wrote something I didn't. Scurry away. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago "A new one" that you made up instead of accurately addressing my points. And then you pretended I wrote something I didn't. Scurry away. permalink fedilink source parent