stolen from linux memes at Deltachat

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 33 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Indeed, besides most linux distributions are fairly equally lightweight and can be customized. I tried 4-5 distros this past January (Arch being one) when I got my new gaming laptop and they all booted in ~9.5 sec for example, and perform equally well in general, they had fairly similar RAM load with the same desktop environment.

Arch is about managing the system as a hobby, which is fine.

One problem here is that new users install Endeavour/Garuda but don't know how to manage updates safely about pacnew/pacsave/etc. So the system might slowly "rot" without them knowing about it because new components use old configs, etc..

I also recommend Mint to new users. I don't use Mint, nor do I use Arch.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Arch is about managing the system as a hobby

    You're thinking of Gentoo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    As a Gentoo user currently vacationing in Arch-land I'm not sure whether to feel insulted or affirmed. Imean, it is but some might say that to disparage it or its users 😅

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    For me: Gentoo is a meta distro, you are the distro maintainer then the power user of that specific distro you created for yourself which can definitely be fun. Arch is more like: let's give you one instance of a Gentoo distro when you are tired of being the distro maintainer.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Arch is about managing the system as a hobby, which is fine.

    Only the installation takes more time, maintenance is no longer than the noob friendly ones.

  • source
  • parent