▲ 112 ▼ Google engineers want to introduce DRMs for web pages, making ad-blocking near-impossible in the browser (github.com) submitted 3 years ago by BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com to c/privacy@lemmy.ml 131 comments fedilink hide all child comments And since you won't be able to modify web pages, it will also mean the end of customization, either for looks (ie. DarkReader, Stylus), conveniance (ie. Tampermonkey) or accessibility. The community feedback is... interesting to say the least.
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) So you'll rather give in to blatant corporate greed? What kind of Alt-Right logic is this? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Engywuck@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) I didn't know I was so evil that I'm doing the world a worse place just because I prefer a different browser. And I'm ideologically far form alt-right, btw. OTOH, talking about corporate greed: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago that is a funny graph. Even assuming the data is true, it deliberately missrepresents market share as usage. Which pretty much neglects the fact hat maybe a person or two and a device with a browser or two have entered the market since then. Also it does not have any information on source of the data, methodology, definition of the terms etc. So it is pretty much worthless as an argument. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Engywuck@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) I didn't know I was so evil that I'm doing the world a worse place just because I prefer a different browser. And I'm ideologically far form alt-right, btw. OTOH, talking about corporate greed: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago that is a funny graph. Even assuming the data is true, it deliberately missrepresents market share as usage. Which pretty much neglects the fact hat maybe a person or two and a device with a browser or two have entered the market since then. Also it does not have any information on source of the data, methodology, definition of the terms etc. So it is pretty much worthless as an argument. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago that is a funny graph. Even assuming the data is true, it deliberately missrepresents market share as usage. Which pretty much neglects the fact hat maybe a person or two and a device with a browser or two have entered the market since then. Also it does not have any information on source of the data, methodology, definition of the terms etc. So it is pretty much worthless as an argument. permalink fedilink source parent