you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 96 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

How... how could you possibly start trying to profit off of a major resource for accessibility to movies. That's scummier than scummy. Fuck you OpenSubtitles, you're the fucking Elon Musk and Steve Huffman of deaf people everywhere. Get absolutely fucked.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I swear I read a thread here (on lemmy) recently that one of these subtitle sites was embedding ads in the subtitles. Now that takes things even further than scummier in my opinion, especially since subtitles are for availability.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I mean I've been a pirate for a WHILE and you generally do see ads on opensubtitles subs. Generally it's opensubtitles saying you can advertise with them, or credits for subtitles that stay on the screen for way too long, but this has been a thing forever now, I don't recall a time when this wasn't done.

    I don't think I can take the moral high ground on it seeing as...well, I am a pirate lol. We out here doing our best to stay afloat, opensubtitles included.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    So frustrating when a subtitle ad pops up spoiling that a movie is ending.

    Something dramatic happening on screen and then "you can advertise on opensubtitles" appears on the bottom letting you know that there is 10 seconds left and spoiling any tension or drama in the scene.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Correct. They now embed ads directly into the subtitles. There is a python program to strip those ads out, but doesn't work with Plex directly. It can be setup with bazarr, but that requires sonarr and or radar...

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -52 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 57 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Oh, no harm done then, lets keep allowing every online resource to implement shitty money grabbing tactics

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    THEN ASK PEOPLE TO DONATE, how tone-deaf can you be about your own community?? What the fuck do they think Wikipedia is doing?
    I've found pirates & FOSS enthusiasts are FAR more likely to donate into something they use regularly and appreciate, this is a blatant slap in the face to those people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    This unfortunately helps sets a precedent for what the internet is going to look like in the future. Even the most basic things will be behind a paywall.
    You cant even read a fucking news article from New York Times, who made 173.91 million dollars last year

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    A lot of things are already like that. IIUC this is restrictions on the API not the subs themselves. If you'd like you can still go to the site to download specific subs. What you can't do is use bazarr to bulk download subs. Personally I bought vip since I found the free tier API limit pretty bad and I didn't think the price was so bad for what you get back. Feel free to disagree tho. Before I automated my setup I was just manually searching for subs for movies I wanted and that worked pretty well and will continue to do so if you'd prefer that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    You've never heard of broadcast radio or TV?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Right, so ads aren't a recent development.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    TV news is 80 years old. It's far from new.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Not sure why you keep stating it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Because you keep insisting on repeating falsehoods.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    True. I amended my comment to better convey my anger

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    True, but just look at how much better it has gotten in the last couple decades. Putting the news behind the paywall runs the risk of ending the battle for impressions and might force nuance into well researched stories.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    But it’s been free for a really long time

    Of course it has. You need to offer the world a useful service for some length of time before you have dominated the market to such an extent that you can cut the quality and jack up the prices without there being any meaningful competition to worry about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    So who exactly does own OpenSubtitles Group Limited, and what are their motivations? If you're claiming to know, I assume you must be some kind of insider? Because they don't seem to be all that open about it. Otherwise we can only judge by their actions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments