▲ 97 ▼ Google Chrome IP address protection challenged by industry (www.theregister.com) submitted 2 years ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/privacy@lemmy.ml 14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [This comment has been deleted by an automated system] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TCB13@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* The diference is that Google says they want to make this feature the default - not something you've to enable like the image proxy. the setup of this service won’t involve any caching, it’s just a pseudo VPN l Yes right now it doesn't but the path is obvious. Chrome has a 63% market-share, if you get half of the Internet using this service by default you can be sure that ISPs will even offer datacenter space to Cloudflare as long as they maintain the hardware and cache of the Internet inside their networks. After all they already have similar agreements like this for their CDN. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* The diference is that Google says they want to make this feature the default - not something you've to enable like the image proxy. the setup of this service won’t involve any caching, it’s just a pseudo VPN l Yes right now it doesn't but the path is obvious. Chrome has a 63% market-share, if you get half of the Internet using this service by default you can be sure that ISPs will even offer datacenter space to Cloudflare as long as they maintain the hardware and cache of the Internet inside their networks. After all they already have similar agreements like this for their CDN. permalink fedilink source parent