you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 34 points 2 years ago (3 children)

YAML would such a nice language for config files but then it turns out that "no" is falsy and so a list of Scandinavian countries turns from

  • se
  • fi
  • no

into

  • "se"
  • "fi"
  • False

I wish there was like a JSON5 equivalent for YAML that just reduces its scope lol
(and no, TOML also looks ugly :P)

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    This is definitely a failing of yaml. Though, I feel that generally it's the sort of thing you learn once the hard way, then it sticks with you pretty well.

    Also I'm glad there are more anti-toml folks are out there, feels like I'm taking crazy pills when people say it is "simple" and "elegant". IMO it's uglier than old-school ini format - at least it's more strictly defined but that doesn't really sway me to convert

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Which is better for structured data?

    • elegant, human readable, indentation sensitive language that's great for deep nesting but has some weird idiosyncrasies with some dynamically typed parsers being too smart for their own good
    • glorified ini

    The choice is clear

  • source
  • parent